Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old January 14th, 2007, 09:08 PM
EasyRhino's Avatar
EasyRhino EasyRhino is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,188
Default Analysis of the Buster Blackjack side bet?

I noticed one of the local Indian shops was doing a "Buster Blackjack" side bet. Optional side bet, if the dealer busts, you get paid. If it takes the dealer a lot of hands to bust, you get paid more. Max side bet is equal to main BJ bet.

When googling for it, I turned up this page in South Dakota:
http://legis.state.sd.us/rules/Displ...20:18:15:30.07

I don't remember, but I think the pays table I saw was the H3 paytable.

a) Idea on house edge?
b) Idea of it's exploitable? I was thinking maybe it would be better in a negative count situation?
  #2  
Old January 15th, 2007, 08:04 AM
Claza Claza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Default

At a seriously negative count, neither the player or the dealer will bust a lot. Remember, it's difficult to bust on low cards only (or on high cards only).

If this sidebet is beatable, it won't be at extreme low counts or at extremely high counts.
  #3  
Old January 16th, 2007, 12:34 AM
dacium dacium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 408
Default

It is not trivial to work out. But what is almost certain is that a high/low count would not beat this. Its possible that a moderatly high count might if the house edge is low enough but I doupt it. Certainly could not acheieve better advantage then simply betting the money on your blackjack hand.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Forum Software vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2011 Bayview Strategies LLC