Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old March 22nd, 2007, 09:57 PM
Preston Preston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Default Switching Systems

I've been experimenting with something recently and it's actually been working out..

I use the mentor count (similar to Zen) but after a while my brain gets tired. Sometimes I'm pulling an all nighter and even the breaks don't seem to help I start back counting.. but instead I use the hi-lo count since it's easier.

Would this effect EV? My accuracy is pretty consistent with both.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 23rd, 2007, 07:47 AM
dacium dacium is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 378
Default

Personally I find hi-low back counting (especially if you can count 2 or even 3 tables at once) is going to be a gazzilion times more profitable. Seriously if you only bet on positive counts you pretty much won't loose and can afford to make huge bets.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 23rd, 2007, 02:23 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Preston View Post
Would this effect EV? My accuracy is pretty consistent with both.
Yes, and possible in a good way. Playing Hi-Lo perfectly is probably better than playing mentor but making mistakes. It might even be better to always use Hi-Lo so that your brain can keep charged longer. There is also the possibility of unconscious mistakes when switching between two systems. Since keeping the running count is almost automatic (and pretty quick) it is easy for your brain to accidentally use the wrong value for a card without noticing.

But there is nothing wrong with switching between two systems as long as you are confident with both. As long as you are using the two systems similarly (not using a bunch of indices for one and not the other) then the EVs will probably be close enough that you won’t see much difference is actual casino play.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 23rd, 2007, 02:27 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dacium View Post
Seriously if you only bet on positive counts you pretty much won't loose and can afford to make huge bets.
Well, you'll still lose the majority of the hands you play so don't make those bets too huge! Your advantage at a +2 count (or whatever count) is the same whether you are backcounting or not so your bets should reflect that. The only reason you can bet more when backcounting is that you are not “bleeding away” most of your bets in negative counts. Your advantage and variance (in %) on those big bets is the same.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!

Last edited by Sonny; March 23rd, 2007 at 02:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC