As mentionned in my very firstpost, I'm about to redo the all work.
why? because the program I wrote loads 6 packs of 52 cards in memory, shuffle them before tha game start. And I want to redo my measure with totally randomized number. No more cards in memory. more like the casino-online do. each and every single card is the result of a random function. even if some of you can argue that this is not the way they proceed, it doesn't change much to me. I will take my new measures that way.
On a land based casino it is a "killer". That "first three cards" system doens't care about the couting of 10's and 11's cards in the shoe, the system is happy that these counts move up and down. If 10's and 11's come, fine, if they don't, it doesn't mean that my ticket is of a negative value. There are tickets made of small cards that are killers. Remember the 4-5-6 ticket I talked about in my previous post. I'm allready finished what I call a cycle while the 10 an 11 counter still things that the next hand could contain a ace or lots of 10's because the previous one was full of small cards. he will then consider raising his next bet without taking into account that he's "ALREADY" been a winner when the dealer gave that wondzerfull 4-5-6 ticket. the 10 and aces counter considers raising up his bet when I go back to my initial bet. while I'm finished, He is still waiting for his 11"s and 10's. In brief the 11 10 counter doesn't see much. He is very limited. The 10 and 11 counter sees 3 to 4 times less killer-situations that I do. and at the end, I will have used my brain 5-10*% of the time is using his. I'm free, he is stuck.
In fact to reach the same amount of money he will need to pay 300 to 400 hands, meanwhileI will achieve the same result within 100 hands. the 10 and 11 couters counts rapidely,a lot for very little result. I count very little for clearly identified killer-situations. and I'm not stuck counting a shoe.
The 6-5-4 ticket is a +50% killer and as you notice there are no 11 or 10 involved at this ticket. I haven't tried casino online casino's yet but it is because of these type of casino (reshuffling after each hand) that I decided to forget every I knew about blackjack. let my mind float like a physic's scientist would do and decided to study that "three first card" issues without knowing the results of my searching. knowing that it could end up as a complete, stupid loss of time.
Yes I bought books about blackjack (20 years ago, yes I fully understand the count of 10 and 11 theory and yes I agree that it works. But only in land-based casinos. by the way, it is prohibited to count. you know that.
To me now, these counts of 10 and 11 are things of the past.
I can ear some of you telling me that if someone must remember by heart 252 differents percentages before he can go ahead and play, he'd better stop before trying. I personnaly know every single ticket value by heart. that means 252 percentages by heart, but knowing all these percentages by heart is tedious and uneccessary. WHY?
because I have classified these 252 tickets in 15 categories. It Took me days and nights front of my computer.
And finally all you would need to remember by heart are 15 number before you go in front Mr. blackjack. any normal humain brain can memeorize 15 numbers with a bit of practice.
when you actually play at land based casinos and let suppose your are good at counting card, you are supposed to have your brain working at the dealer's speed, not at your speed. With the first three cards theory you still have a brain counting (basically what will be your next bet) and YOU DO THAT AT YOUR OWN RYTHM. start playing on someonelse hand, not even sitting at the table. you don(t need to be ready for the next hand. you can play one hand of of two at the begining. you won't care about the counts of 10'sand 11's, and take all the time you need. maybe you will place your next bet on another table. Because you don't count the 11's and 10's you do not need to stick to a shoe of cards, you are free. dealers won't even look at you and you won't look like someone counting cards. Even when seated at a table, the dealer won't see anything. Isn't it normal that you look at your own cards and the dealer's card. you all do that. For a dealer that's normal.
Another point now
One of the message I read in the forum was complaining that the margin between the minimum bet and the maximum bet whas to small.
With my system, starting at 10$, I never bet more than 25$, I mean never, before I go back to my initial 10$ bet. So my bets and my hopes of earning are always staying in range. let's suppose you have a system that gives, according to your estimate, 50$ average every 100 hands. Do you think you are still in control of your destiny if, according to your method, you find yourself betting 120$ - 150 $ - 180$. I would say that you are running out of control. Only luck will apply for 97% of your final result and your system for 3%.
To me a table that has a minimum of 10$ and a maximum of 30$ is already fine.. I have not restiction of that type.
I don't want to hurt anybody but instead of naming my posts
"The first three cards" I could have titled it:
"LAST CENTURY USELESS COUNTS OF TENs AND ACES"
And last but not least, since the online casino system reshuffle the cards after every hand, you won't beat these casinos until you accept once for all that all what you have learned in the past is now outdated. YOU HAVE TO FIND A NEW APPROACH. the first three cards approach is one. I'm not saying that it is the only one, but thought I didn't expect much from it's study,it ended up a beautifull system.
for those who still go to land-based casino, stick around when you see these posts (the first three cards). because for you that system will work better than for those playing online and better than those counting 10 and aces. it will detect four winners while the 11 and 10 counter will detect only one. trust me.
best regards, see you tommorow for a bit of boring but neccessary theory
ben
why? because the program I wrote loads 6 packs of 52 cards in memory, shuffle them before tha game start. And I want to redo my measure with totally randomized number. No more cards in memory. more like the casino-online do. each and every single card is the result of a random function. even if some of you can argue that this is not the way they proceed, it doesn't change much to me. I will take my new measures that way.
On a land based casino it is a "killer". That "first three cards" system doens't care about the couting of 10's and 11's cards in the shoe, the system is happy that these counts move up and down. If 10's and 11's come, fine, if they don't, it doesn't mean that my ticket is of a negative value. There are tickets made of small cards that are killers. Remember the 4-5-6 ticket I talked about in my previous post. I'm allready finished what I call a cycle while the 10 an 11 counter still things that the next hand could contain a ace or lots of 10's because the previous one was full of small cards. he will then consider raising his next bet without taking into account that he's "ALREADY" been a winner when the dealer gave that wondzerfull 4-5-6 ticket. the 10 and aces counter considers raising up his bet when I go back to my initial bet. while I'm finished, He is still waiting for his 11"s and 10's. In brief the 11 10 counter doesn't see much. He is very limited. The 10 and 11 counter sees 3 to 4 times less killer-situations that I do. and at the end, I will have used my brain 5-10*% of the time is using his. I'm free, he is stuck.
In fact to reach the same amount of money he will need to pay 300 to 400 hands, meanwhileI will achieve the same result within 100 hands. the 10 and 11 couters counts rapidely,a lot for very little result. I count very little for clearly identified killer-situations. and I'm not stuck counting a shoe.
The 6-5-4 ticket is a +50% killer and as you notice there are no 11 or 10 involved at this ticket. I haven't tried casino online casino's yet but it is because of these type of casino (reshuffling after each hand) that I decided to forget every I knew about blackjack. let my mind float like a physic's scientist would do and decided to study that "three first card" issues without knowing the results of my searching. knowing that it could end up as a complete, stupid loss of time.
Yes I bought books about blackjack (20 years ago, yes I fully understand the count of 10 and 11 theory and yes I agree that it works. But only in land-based casinos. by the way, it is prohibited to count. you know that.
To me now, these counts of 10 and 11 are things of the past.
I can ear some of you telling me that if someone must remember by heart 252 differents percentages before he can go ahead and play, he'd better stop before trying. I personnaly know every single ticket value by heart. that means 252 percentages by heart, but knowing all these percentages by heart is tedious and uneccessary. WHY?
because I have classified these 252 tickets in 15 categories. It Took me days and nights front of my computer.
And finally all you would need to remember by heart are 15 number before you go in front Mr. blackjack. any normal humain brain can memeorize 15 numbers with a bit of practice.
when you actually play at land based casinos and let suppose your are good at counting card, you are supposed to have your brain working at the dealer's speed, not at your speed. With the first three cards theory you still have a brain counting (basically what will be your next bet) and YOU DO THAT AT YOUR OWN RYTHM. start playing on someonelse hand, not even sitting at the table. you don(t need to be ready for the next hand. you can play one hand of of two at the begining. you won't care about the counts of 10'sand 11's, and take all the time you need. maybe you will place your next bet on another table. Because you don't count the 11's and 10's you do not need to stick to a shoe of cards, you are free. dealers won't even look at you and you won't look like someone counting cards. Even when seated at a table, the dealer won't see anything. Isn't it normal that you look at your own cards and the dealer's card. you all do that. For a dealer that's normal.
Another point now
One of the message I read in the forum was complaining that the margin between the minimum bet and the maximum bet whas to small.
With my system, starting at 10$, I never bet more than 25$, I mean never, before I go back to my initial 10$ bet. So my bets and my hopes of earning are always staying in range. let's suppose you have a system that gives, according to your estimate, 50$ average every 100 hands. Do you think you are still in control of your destiny if, according to your method, you find yourself betting 120$ - 150 $ - 180$. I would say that you are running out of control. Only luck will apply for 97% of your final result and your system for 3%.
To me a table that has a minimum of 10$ and a maximum of 30$ is already fine.. I have not restiction of that type.
I don't want to hurt anybody but instead of naming my posts
"The first three cards" I could have titled it:
"LAST CENTURY USELESS COUNTS OF TENs AND ACES"
And last but not least, since the online casino system reshuffle the cards after every hand, you won't beat these casinos until you accept once for all that all what you have learned in the past is now outdated. YOU HAVE TO FIND A NEW APPROACH. the first three cards approach is one. I'm not saying that it is the only one, but thought I didn't expect much from it's study,it ended up a beautifull system.
for those who still go to land-based casino, stick around when you see these posts (the first three cards). because for you that system will work better than for those playing online and better than those counting 10 and aces. it will detect four winners while the 11 and 10 counter will detect only one. trust me.
best regards, see you tommorow for a bit of boring but neccessary theory
ben