
|

April 15th, 2007, 06:44 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
September 11th Revisited -VIDEO
September 11th Revisited
September 11th Revisited v.2 is a follow up to perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on television. Featuring interviews with eyewitnesses & firefighters, along with expert analysis by Professor Steven E. Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, MIT Engineer Jeffrey King, and Professor James H. Fetzer.
VIDEO (83min) - http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...15681105&hl=en
|

April 15th, 2007, 07:30 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the chicken coop
Posts: 1,948
|
|
pulverized concrete? from reinforced concrete?
reinforced concrete is super strong.
Quote:
|
Concrete is a mixture of cement (usually Portland cement) and stone aggregate. When mixed with a small amount of water, the cement hydrates to form a microscopic opaque crystal lattice structure encapsulating and locking the aggregate into its rigid structure. Typical concrete mixes have high resistance to compressive stresses (about 4,000 psi (27.5 MPa)
|
Quote:
If a material with high strength in tension, such as steel, is placed in concrete, then the composite material, reinforced concrete, resists compression, bending, and other direct tensile actions. A reinforced concrete section where the concrete resists the compression and steel resists the tension can be made into almost any shape and size for the construction industry.
Depending on the type of concrete mix and steel employed, reinforced concrete structures can support 300 to 500 times their combined weight
|
how?
|

April 15th, 2007, 11:32 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus
pulverized concrete? from reinforced concrete?
reinforced concrete is super strong. how?
|
Well Dr. Jones stresses the existence of thermate for cutting the steel supports throughout the towers. The seismic spikes that were recorded at the initial momnts of each collapse would indicate micro-nukes for purpose of shaking the structures free as the thermate completed the cuts. BUT the pulverized reinforced concrete suggests that exotic directed energy weaponry was also used, something that offically doesn't exist. zg
Last edited by zengrifter; April 15th, 2007 at 11:38 PM.
|

April 16th, 2007, 05:56 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the chicken coop
Posts: 1,948
|
|
Quote:
|
BUT the pulverized reinforced concrete suggests that exotic directed energy weaponry was also used, something that offically doesn't exist. zg
|
I saw the videos, (as we all have) and just dont get it.
|

April 16th, 2007, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus
I saw the videos, (as we all have) and just dont get it.
|
Its a mystery. All we can know is what didn't happen - jetliners did not bring the three towers down. zg
|

April 16th, 2007, 12:51 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
...BUT the pulverized reinforced concrete suggests that exotic directed energy weaponry was also used, something that offically doesn't exist. zg
|
Its interesting to note that Dr. Judy Wood, of Clemson University, notes that much of NIST's "pancake collapse" analysis was provided by a firm called Applied Research Associates, a firm engaged in the development of directed-energy weaponry. zg
|

April 16th, 2007, 02:18 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the chicken coop
Posts: 1,948
|
|
Quote:
|
directed-energy weaponry. zg
|
is that like Archimedes' heat ray?

its ancient technology, but effective
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes
the man
|

April 16th, 2007, 04:23 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus
is that like Archimedes' heat ray?

its ancient technology, but effective
|
Yes, only more like nuclear+microwave, so that things disinigrate from the inside out. zg
|

April 19th, 2007, 03:24 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CALIFORNIA
Posts: 218
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
September 11th Revisited
September 11th Revisited v.2 is a follow up to perhaps the most riveting film ever made about the destruction of the World Trade Center. This is a powerful documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on television. Featuring interviews with eyewitnesses & firefighters, along with expert analysis by Professor Steven E. Jones, Professor David Ray Griffin, MIT Engineer Jeffrey King, and Professor James H. Fetzer.
VIDEO (83min) - http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...15681105&hl=en
|
I found the 2nd video to be incredible. Indisputable squibs appearing in the video suggesting demolition. I am puzzled. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...49894376&hl=en
|

April 25th, 2007, 03:54 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,186
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDITANK
I found the 2nd video to be incredible. Indisputable squibs appearing in the video suggesting demolition. I am puzzled.
|
Bottom line: 9/11 was some sort of inside job - a controlled dmeolition of three skyscrapers in NYC - the planes, if there were any planes, idn't bring the three buildings down. As for the Pentagon, I am not convinced that a jetliner struck there either. zg
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48 AM.
|