Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old April 17th, 2007, 01:24 PM
KillSwitch KillSwitch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default Spreading 1-6 with reKO

I know that with reKO, it is best advised to spread your bets 1-8. Is it still possible to beat DD DAS h17 in the long run spreading 1-6? I have a six thousand dollar bankroll, and the few times I've gone to the ten dollar tables and spread 1-6 I've made a good chunk of change. Bankrolls should be 100 times the max bet, so I think my risk of ruin will be acceptable. But the real question is whether spreading 1-6 will be profitable in the long run. What do you guys think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 17th, 2007, 01:46 PM
Mimosine's Avatar
Mimosine Mimosine is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sunny Southern California
Posts: 1,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillSwitch View Post
I know that with reKO, it is best advised to spread your bets 1-8. Is it still possible to beat DD DAS h17 in the long run spreading 1-6? I have a six thousand dollar bankroll, and the few times I've gone to the ten dollar tables and spread 1-6 I've made a good chunk of change. Bankrolls should be 100 times the max bet, so I think my risk of ruin will be acceptable. But the real question is whether spreading 1-6 will be profitable in the long run. What do you guys think?
using "straight" KO, a 1-2 spread with index & insurance is +EV.
a 1-5 spread was something like +1.2% so my guess is yes, 1-6 is profitable (so long as reKO is as or more efficient than KO).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 17th, 2007, 01:58 PM
KillSwitch KillSwitch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mimosine View Post
using "straight" KO, a 1-2 spread with index & insurance is +EV.
a 1-5 spread was something like +1.2% so my guess is yes, 1-6 is profitable (so long as reKO is as or more efficient than KO).
Thanks. I think I'll take the plunge and move up to the $10 tables. Better camo there, lots of high rollers routinely betting 100-200 per hand (especially Asians). I don't get a single look from the pit betting my $60.

As far as how reKO compares to original KO, I'm not sure, but I think I remember reading that pretty much any legitimate counting strategy has a very minute difference in terms of long run effectiveness.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 17th, 2007, 02:08 PM
KillSwitch KillSwitch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default

As a matter of fact, here's a chart comparing KO to reKO. KO is slightly more effective, so I'll probably look more into switching to that eventually. reKO has been pretty good to me though, so far.

http://www.qfit.com/rekotables.htm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 17th, 2007, 03:32 PM
ChefJJ's Avatar
ChefJJ ChefJJ is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 1,747
Default

What is the difference between reKO and KO?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 17th, 2007, 03:38 PM
KillSwitch KillSwitch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChefJJ View Post
What is the difference between reKO and KO?
The biggest difference between reKO and KO is that in reKO, index deviations all start at counts of +2 or higher, whether you're playing DD or 6D. It's good for rookies like me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC