How to bet with a replenishable bankroll?

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
#1
After the dent my BR took in Vegas i'm fully prepared to lose the remainder of my dwindling BR over the next few months. Fall however brings new opportunities.

If you were going to have a replensihable bankroll of $10k, built up from $0 at a rate of $1k per month, after how many months, or at what %age of the 10k in the bank can you start betting as if you actually had the 10k?

Having only $1000 seems too small to max bet at the $100 level (only 10 max bets), but what is the correct amount of money to have to bet at this level? 30 max bets?

is it a really bad idea to bet on a bankroll that you don't have, but one day will? my sense is that it is not a bad idea, based on advice seen in earlier threads, but i've never seen a definite answer. the BR will be true in every sense - it will be only for BJ, but i do want to keep my ROR low, and 10k seems to be the right level to make that happen. (or at least 5k).

thanks in advance. -M.
 
Last edited:

Sonny

Well-Known Member
#2
Mimosine said:
Having only $1000 seems too small to max bet at the $100 level (only 10 max bets), but what is the correct amount of money to have to bet at this level? 30 max bets?
There has been quite a bit of research done on the Replenishable Bankroll concept. Many formulas have been created and debated, and various approaches have been analyzed. In my opinion it has been overanalyzed to death (this coming from the guy who loves to play with formulas!:laugh: )

If it were me, I would use a very simple approach. Basically you have two options:

1) You can begin playing immediately with your first $1k and play at low stakes, gradually increasing your stakes as your bankroll grows. This approach will get you in action the soonest but your initial EV probably won’t be worthwhile. On the other hand, if you hit some moderately positive variance you might earn enough to start playing the big money early.

2) You can save up your money for a few months until you have enough to make your first trip using your full spread (as though you had the $10k already). You could use the trip ROR formula to determine how much $$$ you need before you can make your first trip. It will depend on how many hours you are planning to play. If you play short sessions then you could start playing with a smaller bankroll and still be relatively safe. If you prefer marathon sessions then you will want a decent wad of cash to make sure you don't tap out early. If you lose your first session bankroll then you will have to wait a few more months until you save up another one.

I like the second approach better, but either approach is justifiable.

Mimosine said:
is it a really bad idea to bet on a bankroll that you don't have, but one day will?
It’s not a bad idea at all. It is a valid approach to playing BJ and it will get you playing sooner, which means more EV. I don’t play that way but I know of several successful players that do (or did at one point). As long as the money is guaranteed to come in later you can use this approach.

-Sonny-
 
Last edited:
#3
Yes, I'm a trip-RoR guy. This is only a good idea if you have a strong non-BJ income. One of the reasons why is if you make $70/hr in your day job, you are going to get frustrated playing for less than that at a casino, especially if you aren't particularly fond of the casino environment and the things you have to endure as an AP.
 

21forme

Well-Known Member
#4
Sonny said:
2) You can save up your money for a few months until you have enough to make your first trip using your full spread (as though you had the $10k already). You could use the trip ROR formula to determine how much $$$ you need before you can make your first trip. It will depend on how many hours you are planning to play. If you play short sessions then you could start playing with a smaller bankroll and still be relatively safe. If you prefer marathon sessions then you will want a decent wad of cash to make sure you don't tap out early. If you lose your first session bankroll then you will have to wait a few more months until you save up another one.
-Sonny-
Please explain that ROR calculator to me. Are the default Win rate and SD what should be used there? Also, how can it determine an ROR without knowing your bet spread? Is it assuming only 1 unit bets?
 

sagefr0g

Well-Known Member
#5
how i've worked it has been:

started with a small trip bankroll $300
got lucky and it just kept building.
but i had the philosophy in mind that if any particular session wiped out a trip bankroll that i'd replace it with earnings from my work. (only had to do this three times in two years)
but the caveate to the use of the replenishing was that i'd repay my work earnings money back once my blackjack play regained double that money.
i never spend any of my blackjack earnings, just keep building them.
 

Sonny

Well-Known Member
#6
21forme said:
Please explain that ROR calculator to me.
Sure thing. The Bankroll is the number of units you have as your bankroll (I’m sure you knew that but I’m just being thorough:) ).

Win Rate is your hourly EV. It is the number of units you expect to win each hour. It will be based on your playing style and bet ramp.

Std. Dev. is your hourly standard deviation (SD). It describes what sort of fluctuations you should expect while playing. This is also based on your bet ramp.

Hands Played is the number of hands you are planning to play during the trip. If you are Wonging then do not include the hands you watch but do not play.

You can use the defaults if you want to get a general idea, but ideally you should input your personal EV and SD from a simulator program.
 
#7
Based on 1000 per month, I would start out betting like I had 3000, then when I did have 3000 I would bet like I had 6000 and then when I had 6000 I would bet like 10,000. zg
 

Kasi

Well-Known Member
#8
zengrifter said:
Based on 1000 per month, I would start out betting like I had 3000, then when I did have 3000 I would bet like I had 6000 and then when I had 6000 I would bet like 10,000. zg
Is there any reason you first would bet as if triple your bankroll, then double and then only 2/3rds?

Would u double your unit when u had 3000 playing to 6000?

Just curious.
 

Kasi

Well-Known Member
#9
Mimosine said:
Having only $1000 seems too small to max bet at the $100 level (only 10 max bets), but what is the correct amount of money to have to bet at this level? 30 max bets?
I don't think there are any right and wrong answers - there is no correct amount. You have to figure what game with what rules and what penetration you will be playing for how long at what spread at what count and see if you are comfortable with that ROR.

And if u play 2 different games, do it for that game too. Do it for the same game at different levels of penetration.

For stuff like this I couldn't agree more with sonny's advice

"You can use the defaults if you want to get a general idea, but ideally you should input your personal EV and SD from a simulator program.".

You want to bet $100 max? Spend one bet on some software. I guarantee u won't regret it.
 
#10
Snyder says play like you have the whole 10k, betting 1/4Kelly. And be prepared
for wiping out on a few months and having to wait for the installment. zg
 
Last edited:
#11
If you go broke their are plenty of jobs at the 7/11 store, delevering (Boy) Chinese food, or cleaning house. So go out and reach for that golden ring. The safety net is always their if you fail. You only live once.
 

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
#12
InPlay said:
If you go broke their are plenty of jobs at the 7/11 store, delevering (Boy) Chinese food, or cleaning house. So go out and reach for that golden ring. The safety net is always their if you fail. You only live once.
people with Doctoral degrees don't need the safety net of 7/11. we have other means of procuring funds.
 
#13
Mimosine said:
people with Doctoral degrees don't need the safety net of 7/11. we have other means of procuring funds.
Most people who play blackjack don't have Doctoral Degrees. Take a look at the people around you.
 

SPX

Well-Known Member
#14
InPlay said:
Most people who play blackjack don't have Doctoral Degrees. Take a look at the people around you.

This could be amended to: Most people period don't have doctoral degrees (blackjack be damned).
 

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
#15
InPlay said:
Most people who play blackjack don't have Doctoral Degrees. Take a look at the people around you.
who cares about the people around me, what do they have to do with *my* replenishable bankroll? the thread clearly spelled out my situation. you injected into it false assumptions without cause.
 

SPX

Well-Known Member
#16
Mimosine said:
who cares about the people around me, what do they have to do with *my* replenishable bankroll? the thread clearly spelled out my situation. you injected into it false assumptions without cause.

I think maybe you're taking his comments a little too personally. It sounds like maybe you're offended that someone might think that you would be a in a situation in life you would need to work a menial job for extra cash.

On the other hand, while this is most certainly your thread, the information is for everyone's benefit.
 

dangeroso

Well-Known Member
#18
Mimosine said:
people with Doctoral degrees don't need the safety net of 7/11. we have other means of procuring funds.
Skimming off of grant money? :grin:

J/K... Unless your doctorate is in medicine, you are likely in academics, no?
 

Knox

Well-Known Member
#20
Shouldn't we mention the concept of reducing your bet level if you are losing? I think that is a good idea when you are playing at a bet level and bankroll that you know has a high ROR.
 
Top