Didn't we already determine that these numbers were either inaccurate or meaningless at one point? I believe it was when CIPHER was trying to compare his traffic to this site, even though he didn't get it right...
Didn't we already determine that these numbers were either inaccurate or meaningless at one point? I believe it was when CIPHER was trying to compare his traffic to this site, even though he didn't get it right...
Right. The reason he thought he was well ahead is because he compared his site to BJINFO.com, not blackjackinfo.com. When the real charts came out he didn't have much to say!