
|
|
View Poll Results: good idea?
|
|
yes
|
  
|
7 |
70.00% |
|
no
|
  
|
3 |
30.00% |

September 17th, 2007, 10:12 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the chicken coop
Posts: 1,948
|
|
Clinton to unveil mandatory health care proposal
DES MOINES, Iowa (CNN) -- Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton will roll out a health care reform plan on Monday that would cost the federal government around $110 billion and require all Americans to have health insurance, Clinton campaign sources said.
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/17/health.care/
|

September 17th, 2007, 10:13 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,199
|
|
If she's elected I'll use it, to a mostly limited extent... BUT, I'll still vote for Ron Paul first. zg
|

September 18th, 2007, 01:51 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,800
|
|
I think Zengrifter and I found something we can agree on.
|

September 18th, 2007, 09:59 AM
|
|
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,947
|
|
clintons plan
|

September 20th, 2007, 01:38 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,199
|
|
HillaryCare 2.0
' Will she flinch? For months now, that's been the big question about Senator Hillary Clinton and health care. Nobody questioned her command of the issue or her interest in the subject. She'd proven all of that in 1993 and 1994, when she headed up her husband's health care task force and then became chief spokesperson for his ill-fated plan. But precisely because she "has the scars" from that experience, as she likes to say, many people wondered whether she'd be up for trying all over again. Would she be vague, figuring she had the least to prove on the matter and that details could only come back to haunt her? Would she settle on something less than universal coverage, figuring the political support for it was too weak? Would she kowtow to the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies, which had started donating to her campaigns?
'The answer seems to be no, no, and no. In a speech before an Iowa audience today, Clinton unveiled a plan that, if enacted and implemented, would provide every single American with generous, but affordable, health insurance. It would do so by forcing both the insurance industry and drug-makers to change the way they do business, and requiring large employers to pay part of the nation's health care bill. It would also come with a serious price tag--for which she's identified serious sources of funding.'
(New Republic article).
|

September 20th, 2007, 01:43 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,199
|
|
Hillary Health Care II
'Democratic Presidential frontrunner Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) outlined her health care plan on Monday. "I believe that everyone—every man, woman and child—should have quality, affordable health care in America," Sen. Clinton declared in a speech in Iowa. The senator is responding to polls that show that health care is the number one domestic issue in the 2008 presidential race. In addition, the Census Bureau released new figures that found 47 million people in the United States do not have health insurance. And premiums have risen 78 percent in the last six years, to an annual cost of $12,106 per family.
'At the center of Sen. Clinton's plan is a requirement that every American get and keep a health insurance policy. The good news is that such an individual mandate could be the cornerstone for a thorough-going reform of health care into a private consumer-driven system. The bad news is this is not the direction that Sen. Clinton's plan takes. The senator is right when she declares, "Part of our health care system is the best in the world, and we should build on it; part of the system is broken, and we should fix it." Sadly, she's misdiagnosed what part is broken and what part is best.'
(Reason article).
|

October 28th, 2007, 10:01 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,199
|
|
6yes, 3no. Does this mean that ZZone is more Socialist than Fascist? zg
|

November 3rd, 2007, 01:57 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zengrifter
6yes, 3no. Does this mean that ZZone is more Socialist than Fascist? zg
|
well some people probably just flat out guessed, and no nothing about politics, such as me, because polls are fun!
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM.
|