Marsha said:
It appears that a positive progession, is the prefered betting strategy. I have seen that it keeps you game longer by reducing big losses. I have, however found, that it is not so easy to win two hands in a row. I have been playing the 25 dollar tables in hopes of a hit and run stategy. Oh well, Sonny kind of rained on that parade, although i appreciate hearing the reality. The obvious question to follow would be, is there a smart way to supplement my income playing blackjack? Or, is the casino advantage always going to reign supreme? I can only assume, that since this site exists,there is a way to win consistantly,or at least profit from the game. Is there hope for the average intellect, or is winning reserved for those with computer brains. You needn't be diplomatic, i want to hear the truth as you see it.
Or perhaps consider less extreme betting systems that, say, with a 100 unit bankroll, say $500, will win you 10 units ($50) 90% of the time. The other 10% of the time you will lose your 100 units. When the time comes you have lost your 100 units, maybe you are still ahead. Maybe not. At some point, and that could be a while, maybe you are behind $300. So maybe you now commit the same 100 units, say $2000, and have the same 90% chance of winning of winning 10 $20 units. Maybe you even win 2 sessions in a row, not exactly unlikely with a 90% chance of winning, and you're now $100 ahead.
There's a million variations of course. And many systems even less extreme than this.
But it may give you an idea, if you are willing to vary your bet and bankroll from time to time, that it is quite possible to stay ahead of the curve for a long time.
While I might not look at it as "supplemental income", or know your goals, or how much you may actually be playing, it's quite possible you could have a lot of fun for a long time.
No skill or intellect is required - a 12 year old could do it lol.
Never been a big fan of positive progressions myself.