Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old September 27th, 2007, 09:46 PM
Licentia's Avatar
Licentia Licentia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
Default Query...

I was testing a strategy tonight. Here are my stats:

Hands - 3641
Won - 1547 42.488%
Lost - 1800 49.436%
Pushed - 295 8.102%

I started with $5000.00. I finished with $5842.50.

Now I am not certain as how to calculate the Standard Deviation yet or if that would even help with this. I need to learn that though. But can anyone tell me if this is possible for a Basic Strategy player to have such stats? Up $842.50 only winning 42.488% of one's hands? I want to know if this strategy works or not without having to test any more hands.

My base bet is $5 and my max bet is $25. Any help would be appreciated.

Licentia.
__________________
Sometimes the truth hurts.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 27th, 2007, 10:10 PM
aslan's Avatar
aslan aslan is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Licentia View Post
I was testing a strategy tonight. Here are my stats:

Hands - 3641
Won - 1547 42.488%
Lost - 1800 49.436%
Pushed - 295 8.102%

I started with $5000.00. I finished with $5842.50.

Now I am not certain as how to calculate the Standard Deviation yet or if that would even help with this. I need to learn that though. But can anyone tell me if this is possible for a Basic Strategy player to have such stats? Up $842.50 only winning 42.488% of one's hands? I want to know if this strategy works or not without having to test any more hands.

My base bet is $5 and my max bet is $25. Any help would be appreciated.

Licentia.
I'm not an expert, but it's my understanding that BS will win 42% of the hands played. I don't pretend to know the exact number; i.e., it might be 42.488%. But anyway, you're right in the ballpark. Sometimes, you will win, and sometimes you will lose. Overall, playing BS alone you should end up about 0.5% loser, give or take a little.

My BJ buddy is a BS player. He wins nearly as much as I do counting. He relys on BS and gut instincts (luck?) to determine the amount of his bets. He successfully employs the gambler's fallacy, "I'm due to win this one." But you can't argue with success. Me? Show me the math. Feeling the flow is something I tried before I found a statistical edge. I don't think I'll be turning back at this stage.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 27th, 2007, 11:51 PM
AnIrishmannot2brite AnIrishmannot2brite is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aslan View Post
I'm not an expert, but it's my understanding that BS will win 42% of the hands played. I don't pretend to know the exact number; i.e., it might be 42.488%. But anyway, you're right in the ballpark. Sometimes, you will win, and sometimes you will lose. Overall, playing BS alone you should end up about 0.5% loser, give or take a little.

My BJ buddy is a BS player. He wins nearly as much as I do counting. He relys on BS and gut instincts (luck?) to determine the amount of his bets. He successfully employs the gambler's fallacy, "I'm due to win this one." But you can't argue with success. Me? Show me the math. Feeling the flow is something I tried before I found a statistical edge. I don't think I'll be turning back at this stage.
Relying purely upon luck is a fool's idea. However I do believe that positive thinking is a resource. So I generally wait for a good feeling about when to go out to the casino. This may not have anything to do with metaphysics or luck. Just means I've made up my mind to think positive and expect success.

Under those circumstances I'm more likely to stay patient and win in the long run.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 28th, 2007, 02:43 AM
shadroch shadroch is online now
Executive Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,254
Default

If most of your losses were on $5 hands,and the majority of your wins were on $25 hands,its quite possible to get results like you did. But its just as possible that the next time you play,the situation will be completely reversed.
Go back and refigure your percentages,but this time ignore pushs.You won 1547 hands out of 3347.Thats a much higher win rate,but its still pretty meaningless.
__________________
Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out just how far one can go.


We cannot direct the wind, we can only adjust our sails.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old September 28th, 2007, 11:50 AM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

The standard deviation for a flat betting BS player is about 1.16 units per hand. That gives us a SD of 1.16 * Sqrt(3641) = 70 units for 3641 hands. At $5 per hand we get a range of:

-$441 to +$259 about 68% of the time
-$791 to +$609 about 95% of the time
-$1,141 to +$959 about 99.7% of the time

Since your average bet is higher than $5 your results will be a little above those numbers. But even for a $5 flat betting player your results are just over the 95% range. I don’t know what kind of bet spread you were using but I would assume that it would bring your results down to much less than the 95% range, which is completely normal.

Unfortunately, those results really don’t tell us much. It would take well over 500,000 hands to really determine anything.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old September 28th, 2007, 02:02 PM
InPlay InPlay is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny View Post
The standard deviation for a flat betting BS player is about 1.16 units per hand. That gives us a SD of 1.16 * Sqrt(3641) = 70 units for 3641 hands. At $5 per hand we get a range of:

-$441 to +$259 about 68% of the time
-$791 to +$609 about 95% of the time
-$1,141 to +$959 about 99.7% of the time

Since your average bet is higher than $5 your results will be a little above those numbers. But even for a $5 flat betting player your results are just over the 95% range. I don’t know what kind of bet spread you were using but I would assume that it would bring your results down to much less than the 95% range, which is completely normal.

Unfortunately, those results really don’t tell us much. It would take well over 500,000 hands to really determine anything.

-Sonny-

How long will it take you to play 500,000 hands ? Playing a six deck shoe with 2 people at the table playing 3 x a week 6 hours a day ? Can I get there before I die ? I am 45 years old.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old September 28th, 2007, 03:34 PM
EmeraldCityBJ EmeraldCityBJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InPlay View Post
How long will it take you to play 500,000 hands ? Playing a six deck shoe with 2 people at the table playing 3 x a week 6 hours a day ? Can I get there before I die ? I am 45 years old.
For the conditions you described, playing 100 hands per hour would be a reasonable estimate. At this rate with the numbers you provided, you'd play 600 hands in a day, or 1800 hands in a week, or 93,600 hands per year. Playing 500,000 hands would take somewhere from 5 to 5.5 years.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old September 28th, 2007, 04:24 PM
Sonny's Avatar
Sonny Sonny is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InPlay View Post
How long will it take you to play 500,000 hands ?
If you play on a computer (either online or using software) you can get 200-300 hands per hour. Better yet, a good simulator can do it in 10 minutes.

-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old September 28th, 2007, 05:28 PM
aslan's Avatar
aslan aslan is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InPlay View Post
How long will it take you to play 500,000 hands ? Playing a six deck shoe with 2 people at the table playing 3 x a week 6 hours a day ? Can I get there before I die ? I am 45 years old.
You'll have to form a team of players who play just like you. I wouldn't bet my life savings though. If you get 20 hands per shoe you'll only have to play 25,000 shoes. A team of five players can each take 5,000 shoes. Say you play 25 shoes a day, you only have to play 200 days. Heck not even a year. Go for it! And let us know what happens.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 28th, 2007, 10:50 PM
Kasi Kasi is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,084
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Licentia View Post
I was testing a strategy tonight. Here are my stats:

Hands - 3641
Won - 1547 42.488%
Lost - 1800 49.436%
Pushed - 295 8.102%
By hands, do you mean total dealer upcards or do you count splits as 2 hands? Do you count a W/L on a split as one push or 1 win and 1 loss?

Also we'd need how many hands were doubles and your W/L/T results of same.

Total actually wagered would be nice too to get avg bet/hand.

Assume these stats are manual (since they don't add up lol) and, if so, I give you even more credit for manually tracking results like this

And we'd also need the HA!

But, then, with all that, we'd be cooking with gas
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC