
|

January 4th, 2008, 02:01 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
KO Stratagy variation??
First I would like to thank anyone for any help.
After much research on card counting I decided to use the KO system because I'm primarily facing 6 deck shoes and two deck hand held in my area.
The rules H17, DAS up to 4 hands, Dbl on any 2, penetration is about 66% but varies sometimes. There is also a lucky ladies side bet.
I practice with 2 decks and use an IRC of 17 Key count is then 22 Pivot Point is 21 take insurance at 24 my bet spread is 1-5 betting 1 at 21 2 at 22 3 at 23 4 at 24 and 5 at 25 and I don’t raise the bet anymore in 2 deck. 6 decks I use a 1-10 spread. I also use Casino Vérité Blackjack V4 to practice.
After reading Knock-Out Black jack and several other counting books, which outline Red-7, High-Low, and High opt I & II. KO seems like it’s the system for me, however, when it comes to the strategy variation I’m a little unsure on what to do after reading the book cover to cover a couple times.
Ok here is the issue finally.
In the book it outlines the top 18 play changers from BS according the count, but it doesn't say exactly what to do so I'm kind of guessing here.
Top 18 plays in order of importance for 2 decks
1. Insurance 24+ (according to my modification)
2. 16 vs. 10 S 22+
3. 15 vs. 10 S 21+
4. 12 vs. 3 S 21+
5. 10 vs. 10 ?? 21+
6. 11 vs. Ace ?? 21+
7. 12 vs. 2 S 21+
8. 12 vs. 4 ?? 17+
9. 9 vs. 2 ?? 21+
10. 10 vs. ace ?? 21+
11. 9 vs. 7 ?? 21+
12. 8 vs. 6 ?? 21+
13. 16 vs. 9 S 21+
14. 13 vs. 2 ?? 17+
15. 8 vs. 5 ?? 21+
16. 12 vs. 5 ?? 17+
17. 12 vs. 6 ?? 17+
18. 13 vs. 3 ?? 17+
(For 6 deck numbers 8, 14, 16, 17 and 18 refer back to BS always)
Now I guess I'm asking if anyone can help me verify my numbers and help me figure out what to do in these 18 plays. The reason I wanted to start the count at 17 is because it avoids the negative numbers and if I get to a count of 10 I leave the table. It also makes the bet size easy to remember, 1 unit to 21 then 2 at 22 and so on till 5 at 25+. Also is there any info on when a Lucky Ladies bet should be taken according to a KO count?
Thanks again for your help,
Spooky
Last edited by Spooky78; January 4th, 2008 at 02:03 PM.
|

January 4th, 2008, 02:38 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,967
|
|
I don’t use KO so I can’t verify those numbers, but here’s what action you should take at each index:
5. 10 vs. 10 DBL 21+
6. 11 vs. Ace DBL 21+
8. 12 vs. 4 S 17+
9. 9 vs. 2 DBL 21+
10. 10 vs. ace DBL 21+
11. 9 vs. 7 DBL 21+
12. 8 vs. 6 DBL 21+
14. 13 vs. 2 S 17+
15. 8 vs. 5 DBL 21+
16. 12 vs. 5 S 17+
17. 12 vs. 6 S 17+
18. 13 vs. 3 S 17+
-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
|

January 4th, 2008, 02:42 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
Thank you Sonny this clears up a lot.
|

January 5th, 2008, 01:41 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 476
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spooky78
Also is there any info on when a Lucky Ladies bet should be taken according to a KO count?
|
http://web.archive.org/web/200304072...cky_Ladies.htm
There are also adjustments if you are sidecounting Queen of Hearts. Be careful betting with KO, it will understate your advantage early in the shoe and overstate your advantage at the end of the shoe. You can strengthen the system by true counting it (TKO) and wonging out all negative counts.
BW
|

January 6th, 2008, 12:24 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 182
|
|
KO Stratagy variation??
I also use the K-O Strategy. I mainly play double deck and use the full indexes. I feel it's worth the extra work because double deck is much more volatile then say 6 or 8 deck games. However when I do play shoe games I have been using the reKO and find I'm not giving up that much (vs KO Preferred) and it's so much easier to use.
__________________
SD Padres
|

January 6th, 2008, 02:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
Thanks again guys here is a recap
Top 18 Plays in order of importance
Insurance 24+ (according to my modification)
16 vs. 10 S 22+
15 vs. 10 S 21+
12 vs. 3 S 21+
10 vs. 10 DBL 21+
11 vs. A DBL 21+
12 vs. 2 S 21+
12 vs. 4 S 17+
9 vs. 2 DBL 21+
10 vs. A DBL 21+
9 vs. 7 DBL 21+
8 vs. 6 DBL 21+
16 vs. 9 S 21+
13 vs. 2 S 17+
8 vs. 5 DBL 21+
12 vs. 5 S 17+
12 vs. 6 S 17+
13 vs. 3 S 17+
There is Luck Laidies Info at http://web.archive.org/web/200304072...cky_Ladies.htm
reKO is good for shoe games also Wonging out at Neg counts or in my case out at a count of 10 (ill have to look reKO up)
I also need to look up TKO
For 6 Deck if i use an IRC of 17 the Key count is 33 and i should use a 1-8 or 10 bet spread.
Can anyone verify my numbers for 2 deck and help me figure out 6 deck numbers?
Does anyone have any advice on counting handheld games?
I know i should have about a $3k bank roll to be successful with a $5 min table however I dont have 3k i am saving a bank roll up and i know that i have a 53% chance of doubling in 100 hands with $100 i dont mind loosing. Is this to risky if I can replenish this $100 in 2 weeks? There are also $2 and $3 tables in my area ($2 is only on tuesday one table at one casino the $3 is everyday one table at several casinos) should i play these games or not same rules as original post apply only they are 6deck shoes and the tables are almost always packed.
|

January 7th, 2008, 12:02 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,608
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spooky78
First I would like to thank anyone for any help.
After much research on card counting I decided to use the KO system because I'm primarily facing 6 deck shoes and two deck hand held in my area.
The rules H17, DAS up to 4 hands, Dbl on any 2, penetration is about 66% but varies sometimes. There is also a lucky ladies side bet.
I practice with 2 decks and use an IRC of 17 Key count is then 22 Pivot Point is 21 take insurance at 24 my bet spread is 1-5 betting 1 at 21 2 at 22 3 at 23 4 at 24 and 5 at 25 and I don’t raise the bet anymore in 2 deck. 6 decks I use a 1-10 spread. I also use Casino Vérité Blackjack V4 to practice.
After reading Knock-Out Black jack and several other counting books, which outline Red-7, High-Low, and High opt I & II. KO seems like it’s the system for me, however, when it comes to the strategy variation I’m a little unsure on what to do after reading the book cover to cover a couple times.
Ok here is the issue finally.
In the book it outlines the top 18 play changers from BS according the count, but it doesn't say exactly what to do so I'm kind of guessing here.
Top 18 plays in order of importance for 2 decks
1. Insurance 24+ (according to my modification)
2. 16 vs. 10 S 22+
3. 15 vs. 10 S 21+
4. 12 vs. 3 S 21+
5. 10 vs. 10 ?? 21+
6. 11 vs. Ace ?? 21+
7. 12 vs. 2 S 21+
8. 12 vs. 4 ?? 17+
9. 9 vs. 2 ?? 21+
10. 10 vs. ace ?? 21+
11. 9 vs. 7 ?? 21+
12. 8 vs. 6 ?? 21+
13. 16 vs. 9 S 21+
14. 13 vs. 2 ?? 17+
15. 8 vs. 5 ?? 21+
16. 12 vs. 5 ?? 17+
17. 12 vs. 6 ?? 17+
18. 13 vs. 3 ?? 17+
(For 6 deck numbers 8, 14, 16, 17 and 18 refer back to BS always)
Now I guess I'm asking if anyone can help me verify my numbers and help me figure out what to do in these 18 plays. The reason I wanted to start the count at 17 is because it avoids the negative numbers and if I get to a count of 10 I leave the table. It also makes the bet size easy to remember, 1 unit to 21 then 2 at 22 and so on till 5 at 25+. Also is there any info on when a Lucky Ladies bet should be taken according to a KO count?
Thanks again for your help,
Spooky
|
Using an IRC of 17, your pivot point would not be 21, but instead, it would be 25. You did what I did at first, you used an IRC where you normally would not encounter negative numbers, but in doing so, you made it hard to figure out where you are at any given point in time. I have a suggestion where you will never encounter negative numbers and you will always know when you are at pivot point of +4 true count. Simply set your pivot point at 104. In two deck, where your pivot point is 4, and your key count is 1, this converts to 104 and 101. Simpler than simple. Since in KO 2 deck your IRC is -4, then iin this system it becomes 96, which is four less than 100 (the zero point). With this counting convention, you will be able to follow everything in the KO book with ease. Insurance, which is +3 in KO, becomes simply 103. Some people even drop the one hundred part when they pass zero; ie, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 1, 2, 3, etc. I don't find the hundred difficult, so I leave it in. Also, it becomes easy to convert to true count using the TKO conversion chart, which has appeared here in the forum several times.
For 8 deck IRC = 72, KC = 94, PP = 104
For 6 deck IRC = 80. KC = 96, PP = 104
For 2 deck, IRC = 96, KC = 1, PP =104
For 1 deck IRC = 100, KC = 102, PP = 104
It's easy. And pivot point is always 104 (+4), just as in the original system.
Also, it makes your preferred counts easy. 1 and 2 deck preferred plays begin at IRC, 16 vs 10 begins at KC, and all the other preferred plays begin at pivot point of 104, except insurance, which begins at 103.
|

January 7th, 2008, 12:24 AM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,608
|
|
Spooky
I'm a KO counter. I'm on hiatus right now. The one piece of advice I would give any new counter, besides the usual RoR, and pick the right games advice, is to have plenty of BR for the level you want to play. That's why I'm on hiatus. I found that $10 games were boring with a capital B and not worth the effort for the the amount of money potential. I have found from experience that I will not be happy betting less that $25 games and would prefer $100 min games. The rule of thumb given by the KO book is that you should have a BR at leasy 100 times your max bet, so that at $25 min 6-deck games you would need at least $25,000 BR and for the $100 game, $100,000 BR. By BR I take it to mean the amount of money you have and are willing to risk investing in blackjack. (Session BR is a much smaller animal.) You can jigger your RoR so that you can minimize your chances of ever losing such a large amount, but you may not be happy with how long it will take you to realize any significant profit if you set it too low; also, of course, you may need significantly more BR.
If you don't have much BR or are not willing to risk much, I'd advise $5 min (or less) games where you can experience what it's all about without risking too much. You can then decide what kind of money potential will keep you interested. It's really all a matter of how much you want to make and how much you are willing to risk to get it, which in the final analysis only you can decide.
And above all else (I guess this makes two pieces of advice), don't do it unless you are having fun doing it. It's just too tedious, requires too much discipline, and too subject to hair-raising ups and downs, to be something you'd want to do if it isn't also fun for you.
|

January 7th, 2008, 04:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6
|
|
Thank you Aslan for your input. Using the high numbers such as 100 confuses me. Its that zero point and I also want to keep the betting simple. I took the numbers you gave me and made some adjustments to give me smaller numbers and hopefully keep me out of the neg. I don't have SD or 8D available in my area but I changed those anyway.
Here are those numbers
For 8 deck IRC = 29, KC = 51, PP = 61 Insure at 64 1-8 or 10 bet spread
For 6 deck IRC = 17. KC = 33, PP = 41 insure at 44 1-8 or 10 bet spread
For 2 deck, IRC = 13, KC = 18, PP =21 insure at 24 1-5 bet spread
For 1 deck IRC = 7, KC = 9, PP = 11 insure at 14 1-5 bet spread
These number changes would change the 18 plays to...
Top 18 Plays in order of importance For KO
1. Insurance PP + 3
2. 16 vs. 10 S PP+1
3. 15 vs. 10 S PP+
4. 12 vs. 3 S PP+
5. 10 vs. 10 DBL PP+
6. 11 vs. A DBL PP+
7. 12 vs. 2 S PP+
8. 12 vs. 4 S KC+
9. 9 vs. 2 DBL PP+
10. 10 vs. A DBL PP+
11. 9 vs. 7 DBL PP+
12. 8 vs. 6 DBL PP+
13. 16 vs. 9 S PP+
14. 13 vs. 2 S KC+
15. 8 vs. 5 DBL PP+
16. 12 vs. 5 S KC+
17. 12 vs. 6 S KC+
18. 13 vs. 3 S KC+
As I understand it the KC shows a slight advantage and is only really used for play variation but the PP is where I should start increasing my bet ie. 1 unit at PP and then 2 units at PP+1 and is used for a bigger play variation. Is this correct?
As far as the BR I am limited to the $5 & $10 tables right now and my RoR is huge but I have a small expendable and replenish able BR so the RoR doesn’t bother me I figure it only gets better if I win and for the time being all of the winnings just ad to the overall BR. If I loose, it’s no big deal because I’m not playing with money that’s going to hurt me if its not there and it wont hurt my feelings either lol I have been used to loosing at the BJ table because I only played BS for a long time. This is kind of good for me though as I am still learning and need the little game to build the confidence for the bigger game later and yes this is very fun for me.
|

January 7th, 2008, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 182
|
|
Here are those numbers
Here are those numbers
For 8 deck IRC = 29, KC = 51, PP = 61 Insure at 64 1-8 or 10 bet spread
For 6 deck IRC = 17. KC = 33, PP = 41 insure at 44 1-8 or 10 bet spread
For 2 deck, IRC = 13, KC = 18, PP =21 insure at 24 1-5 bet spread
For 1 deck IRC = 7, KC = 9, PP = 11 insure at 14 1-5 bet spread
Spooky78,
I may be way off here ( and please...anyone feel free to correct me) but I believe you should take insurance 1 point below your pivot point.
__________________
SD Padres
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.
|