
|

April 2nd, 2008, 05:56 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
|
|
Can you gain an edge my Card Watching?
Good Evening Everyone, I Enjoy to play blackjack mostly as a form of enterainment, but i have a strategy that i use, i like to play at full or nearly full tables and play two hands, and watch the cards, if i see a couple rounds of small cards, i raise my bets, if i see a couple rounds of big card i keep the bet at the minimum. I say to myself, "ok i seen a couple hands with alot more 2-6's then 10's and then i seen a couple hands of alot more 10's so were even now" Other times i might think ok I have been about 3 hands with many 2-6's I raise my bets, then i see more hands with mostly 10's and lower my bet, then i maybe one more hand with mostly 2-6's and higher it again, not as high as when i seen 3 hands but still higher then the minimum. Anyway, I was wondering am i gaining any mathemical edge by doing this? it seems to be working, im making money, but im waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I play perfect BS.
The rules i play mostly are S17, DAS, RSA, 6 Decks about 80 Pen.
Write back
Thanks
Last edited by Carmine782; April 2nd, 2008 at 05:59 PM.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 63
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carmine782
Good Evening Everyone, I Enjoy to play blackjack mostly as a form of enterainment, but i have a strategy that i use, i like to play at full or nearly full tables and play two hands, and watch the cards, if i see a couple rounds of small cards, i raise my bets, if i see a couple rounds of big card i keep the bet at the minimum. I say to myself, "ok i seen a couple hands with alot more 2-6's then 10's and then i seen a couple hands of alot more 10's so were even now" Other times i might think ok I have been about 3 hands with many 2-6's I raise my bets, then i see more hands with mostly 10's and lower my bet, then i maybe one more hand with mostly 2-6's and higher it again, not as high as when i seen 3 hands but still higher then the minimum. Anyway, I was wondering am i gaining any mathemical edge by doing this? it seems to be working, im making money, but im waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I play perfect BS.
The rules i play mostly are S17, DAS, RSA, 6 Decks about 80 Pen.
Write back
Thanks
|
Are you opposed to actually counting?
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by godeem23
Are you opposed to actually counting?
|
No i tried, i just cant do it
Last edited by Carmine782; April 2nd, 2008 at 06:31 PM.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 213
|
|
Sounds like you're doing a very basic count of sorts to me in any case... simply by identifying that there are a few small cards out, you're already making an assumption that there are larger ones remaining. That of course is better for the player, so you're betting higher (and winning).
You'll get better results with a more indepth count, but the basics of what you are saying make sense to me. I do think however its not a wise strategy for the long term. A game without a counting advantage is a game with a long term edge favouring the casino... a perfect count only puts the game in the players advantage by a tiny percentage. An imperfect count, like the one you're undertaking, will keep the casino advantage intact...
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 63
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carmine782
No im tried, i just cant do it
|
Practice, practice, practice!! Anyway, it's difficult to determine your advantage (or disadvantage) unless your using an exact system. We can't tell a computer "raise the bet if you see some small cards." It needs to be more accurate. I guess I'll let one of the pros like Sonny or Rhino decide if they think you have an advantage or not.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,966
|
|
Most likely you’re not getting an advantage. You might be reducing the house edge a bit if you are very accurate, but probably you’re just losing more money by raising your bets in neutral situations. It takes a lot of small cards to come out before you get an advantage, and that number changes based on how many decks are left. The biggest problem is that the cumulative removals (what we call the running count) are probably getting less accurate as more cards are dealt. You may be keeping track accurately for the past several rounds, but you really need to know the overall ratio of all cards played so far to know where you stand against the house. This above assumes that you are playing perfect basic strategy as well.
You also don’t mention how much you raise your bets when you perceive an advantage. A card counter will often bet up to 10 or 15 times his minimum bet in order to get an advantage. Using a very small bet spread will not give you an advantage no matter how accurate you are. For that reason, most card counters will not even play unless they have the advantage. Your chances of success are greater when you aren’t losing money to the house edge 75% of the time.
And even if you did get an advantage you would need a very large bankroll in order to keep from going broke during a normal losing streak. Those chips can disappear very quickly once you start raising your bets, especially if you are doing it in neutral situations by accident. Any card counter will tell you that it can be very tough to get a decent advantage even when you’re playing with incredible accuracy. There is very little hope for someone playing by the seat of their pants. I’m not saying it can’t happen, just that it probably won’t for most people.
As for card counting being to hard, I can sort of agree with you on that. I thought the same thing when I started learning hoe to count. I thought it again when I started learning how to estimate the discards. I thought it again when I started doing true count conversions. I thought it again when I started learning how to bet properly. I thought it again when I saw how fast they deal in casinos. I've had that same thought almost every step of the way. But, with a lot of practice, I learned how to do all of those things well enough to make some decent money. It just takes time and patience.
-Sonny-
__________________
It's not the size of your bankroll, it's how you leverage it!
Last edited by Sonny; April 2nd, 2008 at 06:20 PM.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 06:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny
As for card counting being to hard, I can sort of agree with you on that. I thought the same thing when I started learning hoe to count. I thought it again when I started learning how to estimate the discards. I thought it again when I started doing true count conversions. I thought it again when I started learning how to bet properly. I thought it again when I saw how fast they deal in casinos. I've had that same thought almost every step of the way. But, with a lot of practice, I learned how to do all of those things well enough to make some decent money. It just takes time and patience.
-Sonny-
|
Well to tell the truth i have practiced and tried, I can almost do it accuratly in a perfectly quiet enviroment. But i had a couple my friends deal to me, make small talk like delaers do, with the tv and radio on to simulate the caisno enviroment and i just get lost after only 10 cards lol.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 07:04 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
|
|
If you played single deck, you'd at least make it to the second round.
I'll second the idea that, at best, you're just reducing the house edge slightly. All you can say after seeing a bunch of baby cards come out on one hand is that you have a advantage compared to the previous hand, but who knows what the advantage/disadvantage was on that previous hand? So the effect would be minimal.
Using an unbalanced count like KO, Red 7, or KISS might help if you don't have to divide by remaining decks. But it still takes a lot of practice.
|

April 2nd, 2008, 07:25 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,750
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carmine782
Good Evening Everyone, I Enjoy to play blackjack mostly as a form of enterainment, but i have a strategy that i use, i like to play at full or nearly full tables and play two hands, and watch the cards, if i see a couple rounds of small cards, i raise my bets, if i see a couple rounds of big card i keep the bet at the minimum. I say to myself, "ok i seen a couple hands with alot more 2-6's then 10's and then i seen a couple hands of alot more 10's so were even now" Other times i might think ok I have been about 3 hands with many 2-6's I raise my bets, then i see more hands with mostly 10's and lower my bet, then i maybe one more hand with mostly 2-6's and higher it again, not as high as when i seen 3 hands but still higher then the minimum. Anyway, I was wondering am i gaining any mathemical edge by doing this? it seems to be working, im making money, but im waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I play perfect BS.
The rules i play mostly are S17, DAS, RSA, 6 Decks about 80 Pen.
Write back
Thanks
|
i need to study what you say your doing. it'll have to wait cause right now i'm gonna go do some card watching ala fuzzy count. a mixture of card watching and exact hi/lo count circa 25% hi/lo and 75% watching with fuzzy count methodology.
so i'll let you know what i think later on.
but yes you can gain an edge watching the cards. gotta do it right though.
__________________
best regards,
mr fr0g  MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrTiP4ZIUfI
|

April 4th, 2008, 10:37 PM
|
 |
Executive Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,750
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carmine782
Good Evening Everyone, I Enjoy to play blackjack mostly as a form of enterainment, but i have a strategy that i use, i like to play at full or nearly full tables and play two hands, and watch the cards, if i see a couple rounds of small cards, i raise my bets, if i see a couple rounds of big card i keep the bet at the minimum. I say to myself, "ok i seen a couple hands with alot more 2-6's then 10's and then i seen a couple hands of alot more 10's so were even now" Other times i might think ok I have been about 3 hands with many 2-6's I raise my bets, then i see more hands with mostly 10's and lower my bet, then i maybe one more hand with mostly 2-6's and higher it again, not as high as when i seen 3 hands but still higher then the minimum. Anyway, I was wondering am i gaining any mathemical edge by doing this? it seems to be working, im making money, but im waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I play perfect BS.
The rules i play mostly are S17, DAS, RSA, 6 Decks about 80 Pen.
Write back
Thanks
|
hi Carmine i'm back. if card watching works it would sure be hard to prove it by the results of my recent foray lol. i got my butt handed to me on a silver platter that i paid for lol. but i found your post very interesting. what your saying is pretty close to what i've been trying to do with this idea of fuzzy counting. but going by what your saying in your post above i'm not able to acertain just exactly what it is you do when and how. but i think i understand the why of what your trying to do. and i know it is very hard to explain just what it is that you do when your doing something like card watching. i mean i just did my version of it for about twenty hours straight and i'd be hard pressed to tell you just what it was that i did. but anyway the kind of approach you are talking about is like what i've been trying to develope a skill at. i've practiced many hours of my approach using Qfit's CVBJ software. well i say my approach but that is really a nebulous thing indeed. cause i keep changing it as i learn more about what i'm doing and thinking about what the ramifications of the approach are and the problems involved. but anyway CVBJ is capable of keeping a log of your play. so what i've been able to do is look at the logs in excell and sort the hands by the true counts and then look and see how my betting really correlates with the true count. so i can tell you that from my own experience it is possible to bet according to the advantage from just card watching and an understanding of what you are doing. the problem is my logs and the results are just a small sample and can't prove that one would be able to do this consistantly. just that it is possible at least sometimes. unfortunately my logs also show that lots of errors occur (as one might well expect) where one ends up betting high in negative counts. not a good thing especially if it happens consistantly.
i think Sonny is giving it to you right with his post:
http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/show...97&postcount=6
another thing i'd like to add is that from what i remmember about your posts in the past is that i think you play some rather high stakes tables. i'd just have to say i would never want to chance that kind of money on an approach as nebulous as i think we both know just card watching is. i wouldn't want to chance that kind of money on card counting either for that matter. but if i had to choose between either card counting or just card watching at that kind of money i'd definately take card counting. that said it's your money and you can do what you want with it. but just know that nobody can really tell you that your likely playing with an edge or not at least from the description that you've given above. at least that's what i think.
__________________
best regards,
mr fr0g  MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrTiP4ZIUfI
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 PM.
|