Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com

  #1  
Old April 7th, 2008, 03:08 PM
beyondbj beyondbj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
Talking whats the correct bs for such bj rule ???

5 decks.

Dealer stands on soft 17.

Player may double on any first two cards.

Dealer does not take a hole card. If dealer has blackjack player will lose only original wager. Additional wagers made due to double or splitting will be returned.

Double after a split allowed.

Player may surrender on any initial two cards, except against a dealer ace. This is equivalent to "early surrender" against a 10, because the player may invoke it before the dealer checks for blackjack.

Resplitting aces not allowed.

Continuous shuffler.



I mainly cant make sure for the following stragery

8 8 vs 10 should spilt or surrender (since it has early surrender, but if dealer blackjack , only original bet is lost , the spilt or double bet will be return.


8 8 vs Ace should spilt ?? if it should spilt , how about we get a 3 , should we double after spilt if got a eleven vs the ACE ??

11 vs 10 should double , then how about 11 vs ACE ? double or hit only??

A A vs ACE is spilt ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 7th, 2008, 03:09 PM
beyondbj beyondbj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
Default

also could any one count the correct house edge for the above bj rule ??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 7th, 2008, 03:51 PM
EasyRhino's Avatar
EasyRhino EasyRhino is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
Default

Because only the original bet is lost, treat it like a "peek" game.

Generate an early surrender strategy, but then just ignore everything vs Ace.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 7th, 2008, 05:42 PM
k_c's Avatar
k_c k_c is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beyondbj View Post
also could any one count the correct house edge for the above bj rule ??
Quote:
5 decks.

Dealer stands on soft 17.

Player may double on any first two cards.

Dealer does not take a hole card. If dealer has blackjack player will lose only original wager. Additional wagers made due to double or splitting will be returned.

Double after a split allowed.

Player may surrender on any initial two cards, except against a dealer ace. This is equivalent to "early surrender" against a 10, because the player may invoke it before the dealer checks for blackjack.

Resplitting aces not allowed.

Continuous shuffler.



I mainly cant make sure for the following stragery

8 8 vs 10 should spilt or surrender (since it has early surrender, but if dealer blackjack , only original bet is lost , the spilt or double bet will be return.


8 8 vs Ace should spilt ?? if it should spilt , how about we get a 3 , should we double after spilt if got a eleven vs the ACE ??

11 vs 10 should double , then how about 11 vs ACE ? double or hit only??

A A vs ACE is spilt ?
HA = .204% (assuming no resplit allowed)

8-8 vs 10 surrender
8-8 vs ace split and do not double 8-3 after splitting
11 vs 10 double
ace-ace vs ace split

k_c

Last edited by k_c; April 7th, 2008 at 05:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 8th, 2008, 12:20 AM
beyondbj beyondbj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
Default

sorry there is respilt up to 4 hands

but Ace can only spilt once and got one card

the house edge is 0.15% right ??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 8th, 2008, 12:55 AM
moo321 moo321 is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,800
Default

Get some indices for that early surrender vs. 10, too. You'll probably be surrendering extra in high counts (hard 17, 13).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 8th, 2008, 09:29 AM
beyondbj beyondbj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 128
Question

can anyone tell me why wizardofodds said under this rule , 88 vs dealer 10 is spilt but not surrender , is it a mistake ??

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old April 8th, 2008, 09:42 AM
EasyRhino's Avatar
EasyRhino EasyRhino is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,193
Default

General Secretary Brezhnev, you would not surrender 8,8 if only late surrender were available. But you would surrender it if early surrender were available.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old April 8th, 2008, 09:47 AM
sagefr0g's Avatar
sagefr0g sagefr0g is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyRhino View Post
General Secretary Brezhnev, you would not surrender 8,8 if only late surrender were available. But you would surrender it if early surrender were available.
right like you would ls 8,8v10 at tc=1 for 6decks17dasls but otherwise split.
__________________
best regards,
mr fr0g MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrTiP4ZIUfI
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 8th, 2008, 09:53 AM
jack,jackson's Avatar
jack,jackson jack,jackson is offline
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So,IL
Posts: 1,764
Send a message via MSN to jack,jackson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EasyRhino View Post
General Secretary Brezhnev, you would not surrender 8,8 if only late surrender were available. But you would surrender it if early surrender were available.
Correct, but it is nevertheless, a pretty close call. I surrender 88 vs X @ +2,NDAS. +4 DAS) w/L2

If you preferred to Sr 88 vs X at 0 it probably wouldnt cost ya to much.
__________________
Jack Jackson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2005-2009 Bayview Strategies LLC