An article in today’s Las Vegas Sun starts out talking about Jimmy Pine, aka “Young Jimmy Dime” who was a participant in the recent World Series of Blackjack’s second season. The story goes on to cover a laundry list of blackjack topics: Card counters, backrooming, lawsuits, and of course a few bits of WSOB2.
Entries Tagged 'Blackjack' ↓
Jimmy Dime, card counters, lawsuits and more
November 22nd, 2004 — Blackjack, Blackjack Tournaments, Card Counting, WSOB
Imperial Palace forced to pay up: $400K to detained advantage player
November 6th, 2004 — Blackjack, Card Counting
My recent post about a $99,999 judgement against Imperial Palace casino in Las Vegas included only the actual damages awarded in the case. Since then, the case has returned to the courtroom where the jury awarded an additional $500,000 in punitive damages. Law caps the punitive damages in this case to $300,000, so the plaintiff James Grosjean stands to collect $1 under $400K for the incident that occurred in Nov 2001.
James Grosjean is the author of ‘Beyond Counting’, an excellent book covering advantage play techniques that have never been published elsewhere. (It’s regrettably out of print now.) Grosjean was also one of the 25 players who competed in the the first season World Series of Blackjack on GSN.
Here’s a link to the Las Vegas Sun’s coverage of the Grosjean/IP case:
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/gaming/2004/nov/05/517780711.html
Speaking of World Series of Blackjack, I’m in Las Vegas this week for the filming of WSOB season 2. This time, 40 players compete for $500K in prize money. The thirteen shows will air beginning January 11th, 2005.
Max Rubin tells casino execs: "Don’t sweat the money"
October 29th, 2004 — Blackjack, Card Counting
An article by John Grochowski in today’s Chicago Sun Times describes an interesting session at the recent Global Gaming Expo. The session was called “Game Protection: Advantage Players”, and one of the speakers was Max Rubin, an author, casino consultant, and expert on advantage players and their tactics.
His view was definitely in the minority from the sounds of the article, but he advocated that casinos spend a lot less time chasing card counters, and more time focusing on the basic business of offering blackjack.
Here’s the whole article:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/grochowski/wkp-news-bet29.html
LV Review Journal: Are gamblers being fleeced?
October 25th, 2004 — Blackjack, Card Counting
An editorial in Saturday’s Las Vegas Review Journal references the suit I mentioned a few days ago, and features this telling quote:
“The gaming industry’s viability — and the state’s economy — hinge on the premise that gamblers get a fair shake. Even the slightest hint that fancy shufflers and other glittering casino technologies can be used to swing the outcome of games is a black eye for Nevada.”
Here’s the whole story:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Oct-23-Sat-2004/opinion/25062234.html
In other unconfirmed news, I hear that the Imperial Palace was on the losing end of another suit filed by the same attorney, Bob Nersesian. The jury is said to have awarded $99,999 to a gambler who was illegally detained in a backroom at the Imperial Palace. I’ll post a follow-up if I see this story make the newspaper or other media.
What is the "Rule of 6"?
October 22nd, 2004 — Blackjack, Card Counting
I recently got this question via email: “What is the rule of 6?”
Casinos that deal single-deck blackjack often instruct their dealers to use the “rule of 6″ to decide when to shuffle. This means that the number of players plus the number of rounds between shuffles should add up to 6. If there are 5 or more players at the table, you’ll get one round and then a shuffle. (Ick.) Four players get two rounds, Three players get three rounds, Two players get four rounds, and a single player heads-up will get 6 hands between shuffles.
So, now you know.
Attorney sues casinos for using card counting systems
October 19th, 2004 — Blackjack, Card Counting
Las Vegas attorney Bob Nersesian has filed suit on behalf of a gambler at a casino in Reno, NV, seeking to stop the casino from using the automated MindPlay blackjack table for a practice known as ‘preferential shuffling’. That’s when the casino shuffles away any player-favorable situations. The suit alleges that the casino used an automated system to indicate to the dealer when to shuffle, thus altering the natural odds of the game.
The article by Rod Smith appeared in today’s Las Vegas Review Journal, and has since been picked up by the Associated Press. Here’s a link to the LVRJ article: http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Oct-19-Tue-2004/news/25027617.html