Recent content by Bojack1

Please, enough with this nonsense. Kj if you really want to learn something, stop posting. Read if you want to learn, and if there is nothing interesting, don't try to make it so. I have been in the AP game for many more years than you, and never, have I encountered such drama. And if you really...

I believe they give you mathematical shortcuts in TC conversion as well. Using these shortcuts allow incredible ease in reaching fractional accurate TC's. So using these numbers for indice play usually takes less effort than figuring which way to go, up or down, with a whole number estimate.

Please KJ, point out the quote in my post where I say that a counter is not an AP. In my OPINION it is not the most efficient way to get the advantage, and it is becoming an increasingly obtuse method, but I did not say counting does not make you an AP. Antiquitated fishermen and farmers are...

I agree with this line of thinking. That is why in my opinion in the world of AP, counting, regardless of which level used, is the epitome of complacency. Arguing over such tiny advantages between counting levels measured by numbers to the right of the decimal seems quite silly to me. Counting...

OK. But you also said your expected bankroll return to be 25% to 50% over 3 to 4 months. Annualized that could be up to 200%, so no, the expected return is not even close.

I have a question. If you are speculating 25 to 50% in just a few months for investors into your bankroll, why would you yourself me more willing to invest in a 12% stock potential instead of concentrating it into an investment thought to be over 2 to 4 times more valuable? If I were a potential...

Ok, paragraph 1. I thought I was reading an excerpt out of BDTH. The tidbit of Mike Aponte is also public knowledge. He posted his own Griffin page on his blog. It shows his yearbook photo, as well as one of him in a hat. Paragraph 2. JC In drag story has been told before many times. He even...

No thanks. If I agreed with you then we would both be wrong.

I didn't ask for hours worth of writing exploits of your experiences with the MIT team, just one that would not be of common knowledge. I will say that in regards to your reply to crapsmaster, that your information is not entirely accurate. Not sure if that is due to Griffin's perception of the...

I'm sorry exgriffinman but this post is so generic and just a broad swipe of the MIT actions that if I were to base your validity on this information alone I would not find your credentials valid. The info produced here is common knowledge to anyone who has read a book or saw a cable special on...

I 100% agree with this. Playing paranoidly conservative in Vegas with med to low stakes is foolish. If you are keeping max bets usually below $500, you are not a big fish in most of the stores you play, but you already know that KJ, just reiterating it. And there is never a reason to even...

The test is extremely difficult. Between 5 and 10 6 deck shoes are dealt for it. It all depended at what time of their run through the years you were getting tested. You were allowed 3 mistakes. Any BS mistakes were a fail, and so were any incorrect payouts. You were given a unit size before the...

Or, you could manage your games much more wisely and effeciently and learn how to maximize those negative counts. Afterall negative counts mean high cards, high cards are good, I would never run away from all those wonderful negative counts. Cmon KJ its been over 7 years now, start making those...

Ok CP that sounds rough alright. I'm glad you're here today to talk about it. But it sounds as if its therapy you need not arguments at the blackjack table. You are quick to label someone as disrespectful just because they choose to jump into a game at a table you happen to be sitting at without...

Ok first I would like to reiterate my congratulations to you KJ. Now just a few questions I would like to ask to see if I can wrap my head around your thinking. You say you move to a super max bet in extreme situations, as your regular max bet is set more for heat consideration and not...