I was searching through posts awhile back and Zengrifter mentioned something about using 1/2 decks for TC conversions wasn't entirely accurate all the way through the shoe. He said that depth played a role in it and asked somebody to elaborate but nobody did from what I saw. Was hoping somebody...
I was wondering if anyone uses the count found in Ian Anderson "Turning the Tables on Vegas" or if anyone knew what the BC and PE for it was? He presents a playing strategy (100 plus strategy deviations) for it but no betting strategy or how he particularly arrived at a true count (either...
Is it better than using the running count or was it something he did before he discovered TC conversion? Cnn you help me decipher how it is actually supposed to be used (it has a deck number, followed by two unit bet, parlay and two hands)? Is it worthwhile to learn this method of betting?
In both of Lawerence Revere's books Advanced Plus Minus and RPC for multiple decks he states that you should bet your money based on the running count and make you playing adjustments based on the true count. I understand that his betting advice is outdated and everything but what exactly was he...
I was wondering if there's a way to convert a surplus or lack of one for aces with the RPC in a similar fashion as with Uston APC. I understand that one is Ace reckoned and the other is not, but is there a way as opposed to just leaning your bets one way or the other based on the number of aces...
Why is that? The strategy has already been published twice (first in Busting Vegas and then in John May's book Get the Edge at Blackjack). What's the point trying to keep a secret if it's not a secret anymore.