am i correct, in remembering that there is a 'upper limit' in the neighborhood of ROR = 13.5% or so when it comes to optimal kelly betting? such that exceeding that 'limit' it becomes as if one were over betting, thus ever insuring eventual ruin? or is my memory on that matter erroneous?
edit: ahh found a reference here:
https://www.blackjackincolor.com/blackjackrisk4.htm :end edit
anyway,
@Morphy, its nice imho, to have options regarding picking and choosing the degree of one's ROR. there can be degrees of dynamic decision making as alluded to by Meistro. such decision making options will affect profitability. and as Ryemo indicates ones own decisions, subjectivity plays a role. just me maybe, it's interesting, far as those decisions, that one can ask one's self certainty equivalent like questions. such as like, hmm i have a choice between some spectrum of ROR%'s (which is like for example 100 counters playing the same game the same way (but different instances) at some ROR X%, then one expects X number of those counters to go bust at some time over the long run), the question becoming, does one want to take the risk of being in that X number of counters who went bust if it's likely to make some given profit?