Blackjack shuffle software that mimic real life results?

#1
so here i have tested many different blackjack software through each game. listed software will be listed below with each result and each shoe rules are 8 Decker Stand 17 Late surrender split aces one, DAS
counting system knockout full

each - or + is an end result of 59 hands on a 8 deck heads up only
masque blackjack
+ 37.50
-525
-240
-405
-330
-300
Dr Thorp
+172
+240
Donald Granger
+7
+300
+155
-47.50
Dos version masque blackjack (older model)
+184


i will run more test, but assuming each software is like a casino , which one reflects more real life outcomes/results?

i feel like i can called out the results on the first one before it happens is it like real life conditions?
 

gronbog

Well-Known Member
#2
They could all be accurate because 59 hands is a very small a sample for each. The result of +7 does look a bit odd though. That one looks like it truncated the payout on a blackjack. How much were you betting on each hand?
 

DSchles

Well-Known Member
#3
Stevel96a1 said:
so here i have tested many different blackjack software through each game. listed software will be listed below with each result and each shoe rules are 8 Decker Stand 17 Late surrender split aces one, DAS
counting system knockout full

each - or + is an end result of 59 hands on a 8 deck heads up only
masque blackjack
+ 37.50
-525
-240
-405
-330
-300
Dr Thorp
+172
+240
Donald Granger
+7
+300
+155
-47.50
Dos version masque blackjack (older model)
+184


i will run more test, but assuming each software is like a casino , which one reflects more real life outcomes/results?

i feel like i can called out the results on the first one before it happens is it like real life conditions?
59 Hands?????? Let me know what they say when you've done 590 million hands for each one!!

You aren't ready to pursue your studies of the game, if you're quoting the results of 59 hands, as you obviously don't understand the math involved.

Don
 
#4
i think the 80s version of masque doesn't pay 50 cents lol just full credit amounts

i see its granger not sure how that happened, maybe surrender?

yes its a small sample but its funny the first casino i could have called it before it happened the other casinos seem more like a 50/50 coin toss towards my bankroll or wins/losses
 
#5
i actually did one point lose 45 max bets on Granger and Fred Renzy says that can happen but i have never beaten Masque version of blackjack highest i won was 3k most i lost was 12k
maybe a bug in the software i hear on holly rollers they win upwards of 80k and rack in a cool mil so i doubt theres a bug in the casino AMShufflers in WA
 

BJgenius007

Well-Known Member
#6
Stevel96a1 said:
so here i have tested many different blackjack software through each game. listed software will be listed below with each result and each shoe rules are 8 Decker Stand 17 Late surrender split aces one, DAS
counting system knockout full

each - or + is an end result of 59 hands on a 8 deck heads up only
masque blackjack
+ 37.50
-525
-240
-405
-330
-300
Dr Thorp
+172
+240
Donald Granger
+7
+300
+155
-47.50
Dos version masque blackjack (older model)
+184


i will run more test, but assuming each software is like a casino , which one reflects more real life outcomes/results?

i feel like i can called out the results on the first one before it happens is it like real life conditions?
I don't think Masque BJ is fair. Over the years after playing so many times, I find if you don't play as the system think it is the correct play, you will lose the next few hands and dealer will draw many small cards to beat you. Basically I think Masque BJ is cheating. Also if you increase your bet dramatically, Masque dealer will also win that hand. So your experiment means nothing.
 
#7
i thought so too BJgenius if you have virtualbox , you can save the game.

play it out 2 decks in save the game. change your bets and play same hand as normal

the cards still came out the same did not change any of the shoe card order however i did probably bet the same so maybe i will try that
 
#8
Masque blackjack or what i think are real life shuffles

1) 301 hands end 915+
2) 556 hands end 267+
3) ?? accidently closed the screen so not sure how many hands ?? end -2500 ouch
4) 254 hands end +1275
5) 59 hands end - 1250

using the Kiss 3 count best rules 8 deck s17 late surrender split aces 4x
 
#9
Masque blackjack or what i think are real life shuffles

1) 301 hands end 915+
2) 556 hands end 267+
3) ?? accidently closed the screen so not sure how many hands ?? end -2500 ouch
4) 254 hands end +1275
5) 59 hands end - 1250

using the Kiss 3 count best rules 8 deck s17 late surrender split aces 4x

video poker double double bonus 97% has won me 2k$ and 1k$
to get 2k$ i started with 80$ and 1k$ needed 200$ seperate phones and software november 31st

go figure i lost over 1000$ on a positive game and i win on a negative game lol maybe i should try that in casino

yeah if things keep going this way i doubt i will see hand # 20k or 40# or hour 400
 
Last edited:
Top