# going for the brass ring

The BlackjackInfo Knowledge Base contains over 200,000 messages posted by the BlackjackInfo community.

Posting and replies to the knowledge base are no longer available, but comments and replies are welcomed on the blog.

Skip to content
# going for the brass ring

The BlackjackInfo Knowledge Base contains over 200,000 messages posted by the BlackjackInfo community.

Posting and replies to the knowledge base are no longer available, but comments and replies are welcomed on the blog.

Thanks for dropping by! I'm Ken Smith, the creator of BlackjackInfo.

My free email newsletter lets you know when new items are published on my sites, along with occasional exclusive content.

Just for subscribing, you get immediate access to my article
"**Top 10 Blackjack Strategy Mistakes**".

You can expect just 3 or 4 emails a year from the list, and unsubscribing is easy.

going for the brass ring

there is a merry go round with twelve horses, and a brass ring worth $29 after the cost of the ride.

if i’m the only one on the merry go round, i’m gonna get that ring every time and make $29.

so now say i’m on the merry go round with eleven other riders and each of us have an equal chance (equal skills) of getting the brass ring (still same cost involved for each ride).

long run, i’m gonna expect to make 1/12 of $29 or in essence $2.42/ride, no?

Macho, stay out of this, lol, no just kidding you can answer.

there is no such thing as a stupid question, right?

there is a merry go round with twelve horses, and a brass ring worth $29 after the cost of the ride.

if i’m the only one on the merry go round, i’m gonna get that ring every time and make $29.

so now say i’m on the merry go round with eleven other riders and each of us have an equal chance (equal skills) of getting the brass ring (still same cost involved for each ride).

long run, i’m gonna expect to make 1/12 of $29 or in essence $2.42/ride, no?

Macho, stay out of this, lol, no just kidding you can answer.

there is no such thing as a stupid question, right?

NO, you make ($29 – 11*ridecost)/12 for each cycle.

NO, you make ($29 – 11*ridecost)/12 for each cycle.

That depends if you get your money back if you win the prize. It would be $29/12 – ridecost if you dont. But it sounds like there is no cost at all, making it just $29/12

NO, you make ($29 – 11*ridecost)/12 for each cycle.

SleightOfHand

Quote:

Originally Posted by tthree View Post

.

That depends if you get your money back if you win the prize. It would be $29/12 – ridecost if you dont. But it sounds like there is no cost at all, making it just $29/12

errhhh, the $29 is EV

afterride cost, if that helpsuhhmm, should’a mentioned that the $29 is EV, i guess.

there is a merry go round with twelve horses, and a brass ring worth $29 after the cost of the ride.

There appears to be a cost of the ride being deducted from the ring value to arrive at $29.

if i’m the only one on the merry go round, i’m gonna get that ring every time and make $29.

so now say i’m on the merry go round with eleven other riders and each of us have an equal chance (equal skills) of getting the brass ring (still same cost involved for each ride).

long run, i’m gonna expect to make 1/12 of $29 or in essence $2.42/ride, no?

The other 11 times you don’t get the ring costs you the ride fee. If the ride fee is 0 my equation is still correct.

NO, you make ($29 – 11*ridecost)/12 for each cycle.

There appears to be a cost of the ride being deducted from the ring value to arrive at $29.

correct….. the $29 is EV

after costfor the lone rider, (edit: errhh long run)The other 11 times you don’t get the ring costs you the ride fee. If the ride fee is 0 my equation is still correct.

yes, the ride always has a cost. thing is i’m wondering, if the EV for the lone rider is $29

after cost, then wouldn’t the EV for the rider with eleven competitors just be $29/12 = $2.42, long run?I think it would make things much clearer if you just said what is the cost to ride and the actual prize.

I think it would make things much clearer if you just said what is the cost to ride and the actual prize.

the cost of the ride is always X plus or minus standard deviation.

once that is factored in the brass ring has an EV = $29 for the lone rider, (edit) the cost for the rider with competitors is still X plus or minus standard deviation.

think i got that right,

edit: so the question, really is, what is the EV for the rider with eleven competitors?

……

…..

edit: actually the real scenario is more complicated, in that the cost of the ride decreases with each competitor, but let’s just forget that part of the equation, lol.

the cost of the ride is always X plus or minus standard deviation.

once that is factored in the brass ring has an EV = $29 for the lone rider, (edit) the cost for the rider with competitors is still X plus or minus standard deviation.

think i got that right,

edit: so the question, really is, what is the EV for the rider with eleven competitors?

……

…..

edit: actually the real scenario is more complicated, in that the cost of the ride decreases with each competitor, but let’s just forget that part of the equation, lol.

Y = value of the prize

X = cost of the ride

Y – X = $29

EV = (Y – 12*X)/12 = ($29 – 11*X)/12

That is the same as I said before.

this simple?

You pay the same amount whenever you get on the ride. Let’s say X

The EV is whatever the ring is worth divided by number of riders. Let’s say Y

So Y – X is the EV?

OH no!!!

I’m not getting in the middle of this…..

Heck i might even learn something…………

Machinist

I’m not getting in the middle of this…..

Heck i might even learn something…………

Machinist

hmmm, well Macho, as i alluded to earlier, the problem is really more complicated in that the cost of the ride varies as the number of competitors join in the fray, no?

errrhh, uhhmm, ok, lol, i think for every equal competitor that joins in the carnival reduces the cost by a factor of one. so two riders, the cost is halved, twelve riders the cost is cut by one twelfth, no?

so if that’s the case i think the EV = $29/12 = ~ $2.42

cause using tthree’s equation EV = (Y – 12*X)/12 for no reduced cost becomes EV = (Y – 12*X/12)/12 = (Y-X)/12 taking into account the reduced cost…… & Y – X = $29 as tthree stipulated or Y = $29 + X, so substituting for Y, we have EV = ($29 + X – X)/12 or EV = $29/12 = ~$2.42

no?

sorry for all the confusion.

is this then properly evaluated assuming the cost is reduced as stipulated?

Sage, I get the impression that there is miscommunication going on here on a massive scale. The only way anyone is going to know with certainty if they have understood you is if you post an entire example with real numbers, and no algebra whatsoever.

It’s still not clear to me from what you’ve written, whether each rider pays the same amount or whether there is some variation among them.

In general, the simplest way to think about any competition is this –

Afteryou pay to enter, the EV is the total prize pool (which might, as in this case, be a single prize) divided by the number of entrants.Beforeyou pay, the EV is the above figure, minus the amount you would have to pay. (And this tells you whether it is worthwhile to participate)If you don’t know in advance what you will have to pay, or how many competitors you will face, then you need to estimate average values.

Now ya did it Sagefr0g,

You half confused everybody and totally confused yourself. Now ya painted yourself into a corner, now what, ?????? I’d wait for the paint to dry, of course i dont think i would paint my way into the corner in the first place. You might want to hop over to Y and have her wipe the paint off your feet………

Go ahead froggy , give us some real numbers and see what ya come up with……. Like Collin said your confusing the hell out of us all!!!!!!

I hate to see my Froggy friend crosseyed all day just sitting on a lillypad staring up at the blue sky trying to get this situation understood.

This might be interesting….

Use easy numbers though frog like 10, and 100’s , easily divisible numbers as small as possible……

Machinist

I’m pretty sure you are correct if what you said its what you mean. It sounds like they charge the same thing every time and they divide that cost by the number of riders. There is also 1 prize and it is effectively divided (ev wise) among will the riders. So the difference between the price they charge to run it minus the prize value is always the same and you should just divide that by the number of riders

I’m pretty sure you are correct if what you said its what you mean. It sounds like they charge the same thing every time and they divide that cost by the number of riders. There is also 1 prize and it is effectively divided (ev wise) among will the riders. So the difference between the price they charge to run it minus the prize value is always the same and you should just divide that by the number of riders

there yah go, i think you pretty much summed it up……..

it was my bad to poorly word the scenario, then up and change the scenario in the midst of the whole thread. i apologize for that, everybody.

so but, thank you everyone very much for your input, as i think i genuinely now understand the situation better………

and sorry for being so obtuse, but i’m sure we all understand why that’s necessary.

i’ll try and sum up the situation and lay some hard numbers on it as Londin Colin suggested.

Sage,

Just to sum up why it it important.

If you pay 1 cent to ride and the prize is $29.01 then you obviously have positive ev with 12 riders.

If you pay $100 to ride and the prize is $129 then you would have big negative ev with 12 riders. (but your ev would be $29 for one rider.)

I’m pretty sure you are correct if what you said its what you mean. It sounds like they charge the same thing every time and they divide that cost by the number of riders. There is also 1 prize and it is effectively divided (ev wise) among will the riders. So the difference between the price they charge to run it minus the prize value is always the same and you should just divide that by the number of riders

Ah, that makes sense. And it’s pretty easy to prove that Sage has it right –

Suppose the total charged is $12, and thus the total given out is $41 to give the $29 net win for a single rider, as described. A lone rider is charged $12 to compete, whereas he is only charged $1 on a full ride of 12 competitors.

So for different numbers of players we get EVs of

1: $41 – $12 = $29 (same as $29/1)

2: $41/2 – $6 = $14.50 (same as $29/2)

.

.

12: $41/12 – $1 = $2.41667 (same as $29/12)

And going back to the algebra, the above all works out because –

V/N -C/N = (V-C)/N

where V = Value (e.g., $41), C = Cost (e.g., $12), and N = Number of players.

QED

Sage,

It might be easier just to back up and look at it from a general view. Back to the EV basics.

EV = (chance of winning)*(amount won) – (chance of losing)*(amount lost)

Since the amount won is the net win after you pay the cost of entry into the game, this can be simplified to:

EV = (chance of winning)*(prize) – (entry cost)

It sounds like in this case the amount of the prize is constant (at least for the sake of argument it is…we know the Expected Value of the prize) and the cost to enter depends on the number of people. Obviously the chance of winning also depends on the number of people.

Using the numbers London Colin chose, which is a $41 prize and a total cost of $12 split evenly between all players, we get the following:

1 player: (1/1)*($41)-($12/1) = $29

2 players: (1/2)*($41)-($12/2) = $14.50 = $29/2

3 players: (1/3)*($41)-($12/3) = $9.67 = $29/3

.

.

.

12 player: (1/12)*($41)-($12/12) = $2.42 = $29/12

This is of course exactly what London Colin stated.

For a situation where your entry fee is constant regardless of how many people are entered (I’ll use a $34 prize and a $5 entry cost), you get this:

1 player: (1/1)*($34)-($5) = $29

2 players (1/2)*($34)-($5) = $12

3 players (1/3)*($34)-($5) = $6.33

4 players (1/4)*($34)-($5) = $3.50

5 players (1/5)*($34)-($5) = $1.80

6 players (1/6)*($34)-($5) = $0.67

7 players (1/7)*($34)-($5) = -$0.14

8 players (1/8)*($34)-($5) = -$0.75

9 players (1/9)*($34)-($5) = -$1.22

10 players (1/10)*($34)-($5) = -$1.60

11 players (1/11)*($34)-($5) = -$1.91

12 players (1/12)*($34)-($5) = -$2.17

This is what Richard Munchkin was describing.

Hopefully this all makes sense to you and I didn’t just make it worse. If not, you can send me an email with some actual numbers and maybe I can explain it better. You don’t have to say what game it is if you don’t want to, but I think some real numbers would make it easier to explain to you.

tthree, blackriver, London Colin, Nynefingers, i get your drift

thank you again all, and sorry again for the poorly worded

model, especially sorry for the last minute stipulation about the cost decreasing as other riders entered the fray.but anyway, both scenarios are i think interesting, ie. the constant cost scenario and the decreasing cost scenario.

here’s my final take on both scenarios at this point (i pretty much relied on tthree’s equations:

there is a merry go round with twelve horses and a brass ring that has value greater than the cost of the ride..a lone rider will always experience plus ev, cause he is gonna get the brass ring.

but if the ride fills up with more riders and the value of the brass ring and the cost of the ride doesn’t change, then there may reach a point where our hero will experience either zero ev or negative ev if the numeric value of the ratio of the value of the brass ring to the cost of the ride isn’t high enough

that’s dependent upon the following:

Y = value of the prize

x = cost of the ride

where Y>X

P = number of riders

then

EV = (Y – P*X)/P

or

EV = [Y – X – (P-1)*X]/P

if P = 1 then ev is always positive

but if (p-1)*X >= (Y – X) then ev <= 0

alternatively

if P - 1 >= Y/X – 1 then ev <= 0

and

if P >= Y/X then ev <= 0

so if Y/X > P then ev > 0

so if Y/X > 1 then ev > 0 for one rider (which was a given)

if Y/X > 2 then ev > 0 for two riders

if Y/X > 3 then ev > 0 for three riders

if Y/X > 4 then ev > 0 for four riders

if Y/X > 5 then ev > 0 for five riders

if Y/X > 6 then ev > 0 for six riders

if Y/X > 7 then ev > 0 for seven riders

if Y/X > 8 then ev > 0 for eight riders

if Y/X > 9 then ev > 0 for nine riders

if Y/X > 10 then ev > 0 for ten riders

if Y/X > 11 then ev > 0 for eleven riders

if Y/X > 12 then ev > 0 for twelve riders

so the ratio of the brass ring value to ride cost must have a greater numerical value than than actual number of riders inorder for play to be plus ev.

but suppose that the carnival had a promotion where the cost X of the ride was reduced by dividing the original ride cost by the number of riders while keeping the value of the brass ring the same.now ev > 0 irrelevant of the number of riders.

this is true because to begin with Y/X > 1 and dividing X by any number two through twelve is going to result in some number greater than one being multiplied by those numbers so the ratio Y/X will end up greater than the number of riders, hence plus ev.

well, whatever, this all is just a model, that roughly, very roughly approximates a real life situation that can be taken advantage of, understanding of the model helps clarify some questions and concerns i had.

a sage is behind the curtain?

Errr, Ummm

froggie just let his online character facade slip a bit

murky swamp water

ok, so now say for the two scenario’s there is a way to gain an advantage over your competitors. the question becomes, how is such a given advantage affected by the number of said riders (say the competitors all have equal skill relative to one another, except for our hero of course)?

such that:

A = hero’s advantage over other riders

Y = value of the prize

X = cost of the ride

where Y>X

P = number of riders

fixed cost scenario

there is a merry go round with twelve horses and a brass ring that has value greater than the cost of the ride.a lone rider will always experience plus ev, cause he is gonna get the brass ring.

but if the ride fills up with more riders and the value of the brass ring and the cost of the ride doesn’t change, then there may reach a point where our hero will experience either zero ev or negative ev if the numeric value of the ratio of the value of the brass ring to the cost of the ride isn’t high enough.

fill in the blank lol, ______________[/QUOTE]

diminishing cost scenario

but suppose that the carnival had a promotion where the cost X of the ride was reduced by dividing the original ride cost by the number of riders while keeping the value of the brass ring the same.fill in the blank lol, ______________

imposter

Where is the real froggie!

Where is the real froggie!

BJavenger…….lmao…..it’s him….the ole redchipper , voodoo loving guy, himself………

I’m afraid Froggo has found better bugs in another pond for the time being, until said bugs become scarce! He’s trying to eat as many bugs as possible right now, nothing lasts forever. Gotta eat while the eatin is good.

Machinist

BJavenger…….lmao…..it’s him….the ole redchipper , voodoo loving guy, himself………

I’m afraid Froggo has found better bugs in another pond for the time being, until said bugs become scarce! He’s trying to eat as many bugs as possible right now, nothing lasts forever. Gotta eat while the eatin is good.

Machinist

lmao, you guz are buggin me

no but yup jus catchin bugs in the swamp here, maybe some day this amphibian will crawl onto dry land and evolve, like some people i know, lol.

so but yeah, nothing lasts forever, gotta eat while the eatin is good, jus what i told aslan, that what you told him?