I actually been practicing with a pretty cool progression in a 2 deck. After about thirty hours i am virtually even.
Im actually counting with a pe. of .68 to enhance my play of hands with about 67% pen.
System:
Code:
1 Players at table: 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
-2 -6 -4,-2, 3, 5, 7, 1
3
-4
5
-6
7
Heres how it works, Once you win a flat bet go to 3units, win again, go to 5, win again go to 7. Win or lose 7. Start over.
If you lose the 3u bet or the 5u bet, resort to the neg. progression.
Play the neg. progression until you win a hand OR lose the -6 unit then start over!
Example: 1u,W, 3u,W, 5u,L 2u,L 4u,W Start trial over.
Small exceptions: If you win double on 3u, but lose 5u, consider it a push and replay 5u,
note: Always resort to neg prog especially if you lose double on 5u.
Resort to neg prog, if you lose double on 7u bet, even if you win the double 5u, bet.
Players at table: The # of players at the table indicate which bets we let carry over at the shuffle.
Example: Theres four people at the table and i won the last hand before the shuffle. My first bet of the top will be three.
Or say theres five people, and i lost my 2u[neg,prog] bet and the dealer shuffles. Start trial over. You would only go to 4u, if their were 6 or 7 players.
Or say their was 2 people and you win the 3u bet, and the dealer shuffles. You would only go to[carry over] the 5u bet, if their were 3 or more players.
Conclusion: Im pretty sure that you need a pe. of .70 or better to make this work. This is what lead me to the AX count. When broken down by 4 its +7 vs -6 : 0 +4+5+6+8+5 000 -6 Which has a pe. .70 and a potential PC. of 1 when using multi-params. Of course, theres easier ways to go about getting a pe. at or over .70
My main reason for this is for cover betting:joker: