So are you guys saying ALL WINNERS get booted eventually?
I know a good friend that I have accompanied a few times in the last 6 months to a big casino in Vegas. He doesn't count but is up well over 50 over about 10 trips net, winning about 8/10 times. Presumably, from what I've read on here...
Yea, I was calling it intuition but you better stated it as just not in conscious awareness. While obviously imperfect, I think this is the case based on what is now a fairly substantial body of evidence..
Thanks for posts.., makes sense that a mere betting system, even one with some intuitive appeal as a positive progression, is just a mirage on its own right. Having seen more than just a few successes with it though, I guess I am wondering if some players are very intuitive of the count...
Does it make sense to stick with a flat unit bet after a loss, say 1, and then increase after a win in steps like 1-2-3-4-5, for example? Assuming that you are around 50/50 with good play (I know slightly less), would there then be the benefit of eliminating an extra costly losing streak, (like...
THAT is very interesting. Seems like this strategy at least provides SOME math, albeit not the optimal degree of it, AND a definite hedge against the overseers. I have 'seen' some big success with a similar approach in a few big casinos in Vegas in the last few months, for some serious dough!
Funny, JustMe, but it seems like your posts, and I would imagine those of others too, get smacked by a few of the 'veterans' who don't agree with them. Even with the math on their side, perhaps anyway, I wonder why such an edge in the responses..?
Hi JustMe, I friended you so maybe we could continue a convo on this between us also, some interesting things I was thinking but just joined so was late to this party. Would be good to chat with you... Steve