QFIT said:
Seems Republicans are for any tax cuts, unless a Democrat proposes them. Then they are somehow discriminatory. The fact is that Obama's bill cut taxes by $350 BILLION.
No, it was a characterization. It may notbe always, but you gave a good example yourself at the start of your post.
You claim that "Anyone with even a basic understanding of economics and logic should understand why it works this way." I gave you an example of a Nobel Prize winning economist that doesn't believe it. One of numerous economists.
The world is not that simple. And as I pointed out, Reagan raised taxes many times.
Gee, where are all your footnotes. The Federal budget increased by over 50% during the Reagan years.
Now you are way overboard. He has not taken over ONE SINGLE company. He is not even on the board of any companies. The gov't owns stock in three companies and is unwinding those positions. He is not taking over ANYTHING related to health care. Calling him a socialist is downright silly.
So, you are saying Bush was a socialist too? Your statement that GM would have made it through restructuring counters what all the analysts said. You are now claiming to know more than the analysts about business and more than a Nobel prize winning economist about the economy.Yes. It is very expensive to save the country from a depression. Too bad Obama wasn't elected earlier.
Are you serious? Any idea how many trips Bush made? Most were to Texas where he spent one-third of his presidency vacationing. Most of the remainder were fund-raisers. I'm glad we finally have a president that works for his salary.
No, it was a characterization. It may notbe always, but you gave a good example yourself at the start of your post.
You claim that "Anyone with even a basic understanding of economics and logic should understand why it works this way." I gave you an example of a Nobel Prize winning economist that doesn't believe it. One of numerous economists.
The world is not that simple. And as I pointed out, Reagan raised taxes many times.
Gee, where are all your footnotes. The Federal budget increased by over 50% during the Reagan years.
Now you are way overboard. He has not taken over ONE SINGLE company. He is not even on the board of any companies. The gov't owns stock in three companies and is unwinding those positions. He is not taking over ANYTHING related to health care. Calling him a socialist is downright silly.
So, you are saying Bush was a socialist too? Your statement that GM would have made it through restructuring counters what all the analysts said. You are now claiming to know more than the analysts about business and more than a Nobel prize winning economist about the economy.Yes. It is very expensive to save the country from a depression. Too bad Obama wasn't elected earlier.
Are you serious? Any idea how many trips Bush made? Most were to Texas where he spent one-third of his presidency vacationing. Most of the remainder were fund-raisers. I'm glad we finally have a president that works for his salary.