I feel if the Casino's give you the opportunity to loose $600,000 they should also give the player the opportunity to win it back. If he had started out winnning $250,000 first I could understand the casino wanting to get him out, but in this case he was trying to get back to the long run expected loss of .4%. Shame on him for loosing so much during a streak of bad luck, but shame on the casino from denying him the chance to win the money back. It should not have ended up in court, but we did notice in vegas except for the insurance pays 2:1 and dealer hits soft 17, no other rules were posted. If you asked the rules they looked at you like you were an advantage player. Maybe this lawsuit may not end blackjack, but at least get the rules posted visably.