Blackjack vs. sportsbetting.

#1
Blackjack vs. sportsbetting.

Has anyone put in the time with sports betting analysis?

In past, have seen arb and other +EV opportunites in sports betting. The anti-online gambling act and closing of Neteller stopped my pursuit. :flame:

Anyone see similar, or higher returns in sports betting vs. blackjack?
 

Billy C1

Well-Known Member
#2
junior_counter said:
Blackjack vs. sportsbetting.

Has anyone put in the time with sports betting analysis?

In past, have seen arb and other +EV opportunites in sports betting. The anti-online gambling act and closing of Neteller stopped my pursuit. :flame:

Anyone see similar, or higher returns in sports betting vs. blackjack?
Years ago I was told by friends that tried "career" sports betting at the brick and mortar places that the "vig" taken by the house made it almost impossible to profit much. I doubt if that's changed.
Any of us that enjoy sports will see what we consider good bets from time to time and feel the need to participate, I think.

BillyC1
 

Guynoire

Well-Known Member
#3
I do sport's betting as well as blackjack, sport's betting has much higher EV, easy to find over 10% situations, but obviously much less betting opportunities.

It's important to only use the brick and mortar places so that you can utilize the full power of your bankroll. If you deposit money in an online casino it'll be stuck there the entire season and you'll actually lose money by not being able to play blackjack with it.
 

tensplitter

Well-Known Member
#4
To me, sportsbetting is entertainment. If I'm in Vegas and I'm up a lot of money I would bet $100 on a team and if they win, I consider my next trip to Vegas "free" since the $200 would cover a lot of my expenses. Or if I'm watching a game that I don't care about which team wins, I would place a small bet on one team and root for it. Even a measly 10 cent bet on centsports.com would make me excited about a game I otherwise wouldn't care for.

There are some people that make a living sportsbetting. All they need to do is beat the vig consistently by picking more than 52.4% correctly in the long term. By following a few teams closely, they can handicap better than the people that set the lines. Someone who picks 55% correctly would have a 2.6% advantage in the long run, better than card counters.

There's also arbitrage of covering every outcome with a positive result. That's done using at least 2 different sportsbooks. For example, a sportsbook in Europe may not know much about NFL football so their odds would be different than Vegas books. Also, if an international game is taking place, sportsbooks in the participating countries would have heavy betting on the home team. The point spread wouldn't accurately reflect the expected outcome, so arbitrage is possible.
 

moo321

Well-Known Member
#6
Arbing is largely dead, because there aren't enough offshore books to play. The bonuses aren't very strong anymore either. Those were the two strongest plays, but you may be able to grind some money out handicapping.
 
Top