Dangers of wonging?

Thunder

Well-Known Member
#1
I recently made a trip to AC where I had fun but I fear my cover has been blown. I was wonging in and out of games and after waiting for about 1/2 a shoe when the RC was going from 0 - 5 it finally reached a + TC. At this point I jumped in and made a nice amount but towards the end of the shoe it went back under +1. When I colored up, the pitboss smirked at me. Should I be worried? Is there any point in using a player's card when wonging? BTW, I have to admit to Automatic, that yeah I'm starting to be more of a fan of wonging when you have many tables to choose from with good conditions. I worry though that it's too easy to get caught when doing this.
 

StudiodeKadent

Well-Known Member
#2
Thunder said:
I recently made a trip to AC where I had fun but I fear my cover has been blown. I was wonging in and out of games and after waiting for about 1/2 a shoe when the RC was going from 0 - 5 it finally reached a + TC. At this point I jumped in and made a nice amount but towards the end of the shoe it went back under +1. When I colored up, the pitboss smirked at me. Should I be worried? Is there any point in using a player's card when wonging? BTW, I have to admit to Automatic, that yeah I'm starting to be more of a fan of wonging when you have many tables to choose from with good conditions. I worry though that it's too easy to get caught when doing this.
The Pitboss obviously knew you could card count, but if they smirked, its unlikely they will ban you. A smirk could easily just be a polite warning. Of course its POSSIBLE they will bar you, but I would just take a smirk as a warning. I'd say avoid that casino for a while but don't panic.
 

Finn Dog

Well-Known Member
#5
callipygian said:
I advocate that one backcount a table for no more than 15 seconds without cover, maybe up to 5 minutes with cover.
Callipygian,

Can you shed some light on how to work the type of cover you're referring to please--or is that not something to discuss publicly? (If so, sure would appreciate a PM from anyone on this.)

Best regards,

FD
 

cpage727

Well-Known Member
#6
Finn Dog said:
Callipygian,

Can you shed some light on how to work the type of cover you're referring to please--or is that not something to discuss publicly? (If so, sure would appreciate a PM from anyone on this.)

Best regards,

FD

you can start with a mustache and glasses.....

:cool2: <------like him
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
#7
Finn Dog said:
Can you shed some light on how to work the type of cover you're referring to please--or is that not something to discuss publicly?
I see no reason not to discuss it publicly, as it's nothing novel. Basically you're looking for some way to get a view of the blackjack table without being at the blackjack table. Two ploys I've used in the past:

(1) Stand at a roulette table and count the adjacent blackjack table. This one is pretty obvious. You want a line of sight to all the blackjack hands so don't stand where you have to turn your head frequently.

(2) Sit at a slot machine and count a nearby blackjack table. In this case a slot machine had been removed from the row so that I had a pretty wide view of the whole table in between the machines, I don't think you can see a whole blackjack table in between two normal slot machines.

The basic premise is that there's no basic premise - you need to seek out the idiosyncracies of your particular casino and figure something out. There's no ploy that will work everywhere all the time.

Honestly, it gets really boring really quickly, which is why I exclusively use the 15-second rule now.
 

Thunder

Well-Known Member
#8
callipygian said:
I advocate that one backcount a table for no more than 15 seconds without cover, maybe up to 5 minutes with cover.
Well if you can only backcount for 15 seconds, then you're essentially saying you shouldn't wong without cover.
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
#9
Thunder said:
Well if you can only backcount for 15 seconds, then you're essentially saying you shouldn't wong without cover.
If your bankroll can take the variance, Wong in at a lower point and count a lot of tables superficially rather than count one table thoroughly. You'll make up for the lost EV in winrate because you'll play far more hands.
 

chichow

Well-Known Member
#10
I personally don't have luck in AC.

I believe that Wonging is the way to go in AC as the playing conditions in general are not that great for play-all.
 

Finn Dog

Well-Known Member
#11
callipygian said:
I(2) Sit at a slot machine and count a nearby blackjack table. In this case a slot machine had been removed from the row so that I had a pretty wide view of the whole table in between the machines, I don't think you can see a whole blackjack table in between two normal slot machines.
This is something I just don't get.

Everyone successful Wonger always says this--but as an unsuccessful Wonger, at every casino I've ever been to, the slot machines are usually 15 to 20 feet away from the tables; thus, I wouldn't be able to see the cards without the use of field glasses (and I have 20/10 vision). I've never been able to see the cards from any bank of slots personally--what gives?

That raises the question: exactly how close are the slots in those casinos where observation makes Wonging possible? (Hard to imagine they're closer than 15 to 20 feet given ample room for egress.)

Also, can someone please explain the alternate method of "Wonging when in motion" and therefore within easy eyesight of the tables (how long before you move before getting pegged as a Wonger, etc.)?

Best regards,

FD
 
Last edited:

itakeyourmoney

Well-Known Member
#12
Finn Dog said:
This is something I just don't get.

Everyone successful Wonger always says this--but as an unsuccessful Wonger, at every casino I've ever been to, the slot machines are usually 15 to 20 feet away from the tables; thus, I wouldn't be able to see the cards without the use of field glasses (and I have 20/10 vision). I've never been able to see the cards from any bank of slots personally--what gives?

That raises the question: exactly how close are the slots in those casinos where observation makes Wonging possible? (Hard to imagine they're closer than 15 to 20 feet given ample room for egress.)

Also, can someone please explain the alternate method of "Wonging when in motion" and therefore within easy eyesight of the tables (how long before you move before getting pegged as a Wonger, etc.)?

Best regards,

FD
Bring a pair of binoculars and if anyone asks just say they're for checking out hot chicks' butts :devil:

I agree with you about it being hard to count from a slot machine -- at my usual store I think it could be done if there were only one player playing at either 1st or 3rd base and with no one being in the way (which means it would have to be done on like a Tuesday morning and it might be odd to have a guy sitting alone at a slot machine, not playing, and just watching the closest bj table).
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
#13
Finn Dog said:
at every casino I've ever been to, the slot machines are usually 15 to 20 feet away from the tables
Not to be mean, but basically, sucks to be you. The one I used was a walkway across from the table (~10 feet) and there were 2 players at 1st base giving me a perfect view (the slot machines were angled).

Be creative and don't expect other peoples' methods to work for you.
 
#14
callipygian said:
I advocate that one backcount a table for no more than 15 seconds without cover, maybe up to 5 minutes with cover.
No way. Just one hand takes more than 15 seconds. I'd recommend watching a table for a quarter shoe before moving on, and that's for mathematical reasons more than cover. I don't believe pit personnel notice backcounters or understand the significance of it, and surveillance people are certainly in no position to watch counters who aren't even in the game yet.
 
#15
I agree with Automatic Monkey. I play almost exclusively in AC and I have been able to watch for over a deck or two and Wong in with no adverse effects. When you are not sitting at the table (unless you are hovering over someone's shoulder, I guess) no one really pays any attention to you.

Of course, I also have my very attractive wife by my side and spend the majority of my time looking and talking to her (good cover AND romantic).;)
 

callipygian

Well-Known Member
#16
Automatic Monkey said:
I don't believe pit personnel notice backcounters or understand the significance of it, and surveillance people are certainly in no position to watch counters who aren't even in the game yet.
There's a surveillance slang term for people who circle the pits backcounting: buzzards. Which means it's at least noticed often enough to make a slang term for it.

Maybe places where you play don't notice / don't care, but I think as an overall statement pit personnel and surveillance can notice.
 

Finn Dog

Well-Known Member
#18
callipygian said:
Not to be mean, but basically, sucks to be you.
Huh?

Well I wouldn't go that far, but I'll tell you what does suck: having to figure all this out completely on your own with just a stack of books and no role model to speak to in person--other than all of you.

I guess that's why not that many people make it as counters in the end. So I tip my hat to all those that have (especially the Pros)--because this is one of the hardest things I've ever done in my life.

Anyway, couldn't have made as far as I have (which still isn't very far!) without everyone's help.

Thanks for all the answers.

FD
 
Last edited:

kewljason

Well-Known Member
#19
callipygian said:
There's a surveillance slang term for people who circle the pits backcounting: buzzards. Which means it's at least noticed often enough to make a slang term for it.

Maybe places where you play don't notice / don't care, but I think as an overall statement pit personnel and surveillance can notice.
I agree with callipygian. You have to remember that survellance isn't only looking for counters. The are also always looking for people lurking around who are stealing and/or scaming.
 

ChefJJ

Well-Known Member
#20
Maybe it's just me, but the whole paranoia over Wonging seems overblown...but then again, I'm not a full-time pro.

I've only been Wonging regularly for a few months now in AC and do it by just standing behind the table and "waiting". Granted, like preacher, I've almost always got the lady with me standing back there so maybe that helps counter the stereotypical "AP look". With regard to my first statement, I'm probably oversimplifying things because I'll backcount for a while after a shuffle and either move on or get in. But once I get out, I don't necessarily rush over to the next table and look for another opportunity...so that may be why I'm thinking this isn't as much of a "red flag" action as it may for most big players.

Just my two centavos :devil:

good luck :joker:
 
Top