rukus said:
thanks for the reply JJ and ZG. i have always used 1 deck resolution to convert to true count, ie count per deck. rukus.
For shoe games particularly, I always encourage truing up to the "count-per-2-decks", done in half deck increments. The primary reason is that as you get 4 decks in, the RC equals the TC with no necessary conversion at that crucial time.
i.e
: 3
.5 decks in, the TC equals
.8 of the RC.
4 decks in, the TC equals the RC.
4
.5 decks in, the TC equals 1
.5 times the RC.
If a critical situation arises late, where it looks like there might be more than 4 decks in the tray, but less than 4
.5, it's easy to fudge your multiplier to around 1
.25. Might be just me, but I've always found that more straightforward.
As an aside, the count-per-two-decks also gives you more accurate index numbers
(if that actually matters). For example, using a level one system, the index for doubling 9 vs. 7 is, according to some sources +3 and with others, it's +4. But if you generate your own indices with software using the count-per-two-decks, it'll likely spit out an index number of +7 (mine did).