MGP said:
The net results are below.
One last comment. The best hands to work on for splits are the AA vs anything and TT vs 6. Those do not require anything but standing post-split. Once you get those then you try 99 vs 6 since there is only one strategy deviation from stand on evertyhing and that's to split 92 post-split.
If you can't get those then I wouldn't bother going further.
One last thing, for all the calcs it took about 20-30s so it shouldn't take forever for exact calcs.
One last comment. The best hands to work on for splits are the AA vs anything and TT vs 6. Those do not require anything but standing post-split. Once you get those then you try 99 vs 6 since there is only one strategy deviation from stand on evertyhing and that's to split 92 post-split.
If you can't get those then I wouldn't bother going further.
One last thing, for all the calcs it took about 20-30s so it shouldn't take forever for exact calcs.
I tried TT vs 6 in my CA. For Spl1 and Spl2 I get the exact same results as you. But when I allow splitting thrice, I get .3407864272
No total-dependent changes to the strategy happen for splitting thrice? You definitely just stand afterwards? Do I definitely have a bug with my resplitting algorithm based on this discrepency? I will trace through my program to see what happens and make sure I stand after the third resplit I suppose...
Edit: In every single other pair vs 6, I get the exact same results as you for Spl3. e.g. my 7,7 vs 6 gives .2433481963.