hands affected by density of 7
- Thread starter psyduck
- Start date
Aces and sevens do NOT "offset" The E.O.R. is "positive" on both.
The accepted method in a "pitch game" is to count Aces via quarter deck.
However, in a shoe game it is preferred that you count Aces by balancing
them against an uncounted low card with the same absolute value but opposite sign.
However that situation will not be easily found, so ...
If the TEN is counted as −2 two small uncounted cards with +1 tags. are the countervailing factor.
The accepted method in a "pitch game" is to count Aces via quarter deck.
However, in a shoe game it is preferred that you count Aces by balancing
them against an uncounted low card with the same absolute value but opposite sign.
However that situation will not be easily found, so ...
If the TEN is counted as −2 two small uncounted cards with +1 tags. are the countervailing factor.
I believe flashes point is HIOPT II does not look at the A side count as adding a side count. So a fair comparison would be to side count both aces and sevens. Don't start wining about how hard that is. It only takes practice. I know people who keep 4 counts at once. Once you develop the discipline it becomes second nature.
It is like when you are born rolling over seems hard (like basic strategy). Next crawling seems hard (level 1 count). Then walking seems hard (level 2+ count). Then riding a bike seems hard (adding side counts). In retrospect the steps seemed hard for a brief period but became second nature with some practice.
It is like when you are born rolling over seems hard (like basic strategy). Next crawling seems hard (level 1 count). Then walking seems hard (level 2+ count). Then riding a bike seems hard (adding side counts). In retrospect the steps seemed hard for a brief period but became second nature with some practice.
HiLo w/7s
Multiparameter Increased PE for HiOpt-1 >>
From - http://wiretap.area.com/Gopher/Library/Article/Gaming/hi-opt-1.txt
Multiparameter Increased PE for HiOpt-1 >>
From - http://wiretap.area.com/Gopher/Library/Article/Gaming/hi-opt-1.txt
Code:
PLAYING BETTING COUNT VALUES
SYSTEM EFFICIENCY CORRELATION A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Hi-Opt I .615 .88 0 0 +1 +1 +1 +1 0 0 0 -1
[U]Hi-Opt I + A .635 .96 "[/U]
[B][U]Hi-Opt I + A,7 .736 .97 "[/U][/B]
Hi-Opt I + A,7,8 .811 .97 "
Hi-Opt I + A,7,8,9 .870 .97 "
Hi-Opt I + A,7,8,9,2 .891 .98 "
High-Low .51 .97 -1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 0 0 0 -1
Hi-Opt II .67 .91 0 +1 +1 +2 +2 +1 +1 0 0 -2
Zen .63 .97 -1 +1 +1 +2 +2 +2 +1 0 0 -2
Uston APC + A .69 .91 0 +1 +2 +2 +3 +2 +2 +1 -1 -3
Last edited: