DonR said:
I'm pretty sure most people will not agree with you on this one, but you may have something here.
Yes, I agree. By math, there is penalty for this, but to me, it works better this way. I remember this has also been mentioned in a book, I think it was "The Counting Game by Alan Berg", "Play Blackjack Like the Pros by Kevin Blackwood" or "Burning The Tables by Ian Anderson", not sure which book it was, it tells about an experience encountering another skilled counter that only started betting when RC goes down while on +TC , while other 2 newbie counters were booted out from the casino playing by the book on the same table. I don't think it will work for everyone, but it will work for some.
At the time when I first read about this story, I didn't quite understand what that meant because I was a rookie, but after have often been killed at high TCs , I started training myself to "sense" when RC is dropping and bet it at the right time at +TCs. It's a skill that will take some time to be mastered I guess. It doesn't work all the time, but to me it works like about 65% to 70% of the time. I tested this using different counting systems like, REKO, KO, KISS III, UBZII, Hi-Lo, ZEN and Mentor. It worked on all of these systems because you are counting for high/low cards for RC, but balanced systems works better than unbalanced ones probably because of its balanced nature. I also tried with the "Speed Count by Frank Scoblete", this system is also posted at Arnold Snyder's site, but it doesn't work at all because the RC doesn't have any relation (maybe some) with the actually high cards coming out because you only count the low cards then subtract the playing hands (including the dealer) after each round to get the RC. So I consider "Speed Count" the "Speedy Lose All Your Money" system. I liked Frank Scoblete's other books, but this one is just a total garbage (at least to me, just wondering if anybody got successful with it).
I tried to use 2 level counts with UBZII, ZEN and Mentor, didn't have any problem counting the cards, but the extra brain work actually blurred my "sense", so I went back to Hi Lo.