Nothing Different In CT

B

Blue Efficacy

Well-Known Member
#21
#21
In all seriousness, I can understand not wanting searches to reveal us singing the praises of certain casinos.

But if we are talking about a casino that we don't like, what is the point of camouflaging it?
 
Sharky

Sharky

Well-Known Member
#22
#22
Automatic Monkey said:
...and the term caught on as a given name, which is now Carl, Charles and all its variants.
Click to expand...

i sure wish there was one less Charl at the Master's...maybe i would've scored $1700 on my $200 bet on TW......make the 3 and 4 footers on the back, jack!!!
 
aslan

aslan

Well-Known Member
#23
#23
Blue Efficacy said:
In all seriousness, I can understand not wanting searches to reveal us singing the praises of certain casinos.

But if we are talking about a casino that we don't like, what is the point of camouflaging it?
Click to expand...
I just want to point out that praises and derogatory comments about a particular casino have a way of appearing in the same thread. If you want to discourage the disclosure of any positive discovery at a casino, especially ones viewed unfavorably by many, just spell out their names. Your thoughts to the contrary have led me to adopt a more sound position than naming conventions.

I, for one, do not want to call casino attention to what I think are their weaknesses. Because we may never be able to convince everyone not to spell out names, I suggest that anyone who knows anything at all positive about a particular casino, resort to a PM-only policy. Then it will be up to one's knowledge of posters to decide whether or not to divulge information. From now on, I will consider any discussion on the Forums about specific casinos to be addressed to casino personnel first, and secondly, to the AP population. If you don't think casino personnel read our Forums, you are sadly mistaken. I can even give you names, and so can many of you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top