Risky, but it works..
- Thread starter mikeinjersey
- Start date
If the man has a fancy outfit on and little wings and a motor, we might think, hmm, can he fly? If he hops into a Cessna 172 and taxis out to the runway we would think, hmm, he has a very good chance of flying and getting
to where he wants to go. All the while he is saying to himself as he cruises along at 110 knots, "so far so good"!!
to where he wants to go. All the while he is saying to himself as he cruises along at 110 knots, "so far so good"!!
Yes because he is using a vehicle that we know is effective. If he rode a bicycle off a building we would all point and laugh because we know that a bicycle doesn't fly. If he was also holding a book titled "Why bicycles can't fly" then we would be pointing laughing and doing a facepalm. If he was also telling other people that riding a bicycle off a building can make you fly we would be pointing laughing facepalming and poiting out how stupid he is.
That's what the voodoo forum is.
That's what the voodoo forum is.
ty honey.. I feel the love.
I'm debating now whether or not to split to 2 hands (just once) on my next trip...somewhere in the middle of my losing streak. like after I lose 4 straight....split to 2 hands just once....then go back to 1 hand.
mathematically speaking, I wonder if it makes any difference at all.. anybody ?
If you really, really think about it. going 1 vs. 1 against the dealer & losing 9 or 10 hands in a row sometimes won't happen for a long, long time. Especially when going AGAINST basic strategy. I'll be honest, I think that's how i've basically prevented myself from losing 9 or 10 many times. (staying on 15 when dealer has 10 , etc ) Of course I would ONLY do that if I saw a ton a facecards come right before then.
but do what you want, don't believe me...its fine. I'll still love ya.
I'm debating now whether or not to split to 2 hands (just once) on my next trip...somewhere in the middle of my losing streak. like after I lose 4 straight....split to 2 hands just once....then go back to 1 hand.
mathematically speaking, I wonder if it makes any difference at all.. anybody ?
If you really, really think about it. going 1 vs. 1 against the dealer & losing 9 or 10 hands in a row sometimes won't happen for a long, long time. Especially when going AGAINST basic strategy. I'll be honest, I think that's how i've basically prevented myself from losing 9 or 10 many times. (staying on 15 when dealer has 10 , etc ) Of course I would ONLY do that if I saw a ton a facecards come right before then.
but do what you want, don't believe me...its fine. I'll still love ya.
I feel it too, Mikey!
2 hands make no difference, except that it will decrease the variance and give you an excuse to bet an aggregate amount larger than just a single hand.
So... if your progression requires a single hand bet of 16u, you could jump it to 2 hands of 12u. After that bet continue playing both hands BUT run them separately for progression...
... or just end this folly before it becomes chronic and irreversible. zg
2 hands make no difference, except that it will decrease the variance and give you an excuse to bet an aggregate amount larger than just a single hand.
So... if your progression requires a single hand bet of 16u, you could jump it to 2 hands of 12u. After that bet continue playing both hands BUT run them separately for progression...
... or just end this folly before it becomes chronic and irreversible. zg
mikeinjersey said:
darn...I finally had some backup, but he's already banned.
He was banned because he didn't listen to anyone but himself, repeatedly made false/unfounded/harmful claims, tried to convince people that his silly progression system worked and never spent any time learning about the game or analyzing his system. Take the hint. If you continue to follow in his footsteps you will find yourself on the same websites as him surrounded by degenerate gamblers. Think about what you are trying to accomplish and decide which website is better for you.
-Sonny-