Stupid Question about Players Cards
- Thread starter Carmine782
- Start date
In Vegas,neither Harrahs nor MGM will give you much for playing BJ at low stakes. You would be better off getting cards for each and spending a half hour playing nickel slots.You'll get better comp offers off that then $5-15 BJ.
Harrahs especially is geared to slot players. Their BJ sux,so I wouldn't play it in the first place.Their Video poker has bad pay tables as well.
Harrahs especially is geared to slot players. Their BJ sux,so I wouldn't play it in the first place.Their Video poker has bad pay tables as well.
Carmine782 said:
Ok Thanks!!
I Have a couple more questions....I Know your points are based on Length of time at table, adverage bet..etc...question is how do they know all that, Do they watch the cameras and then find it out or they have someone watching you ..Just curious
I Have a couple more questions....I Know your points are based on Length of time at table, adverage bet..etc...question is how do they know all that, Do they watch the cameras and then find it out or they have someone watching you ..Just curious
Playloud said:
The only time I have played a slot machine, I played a dollar machine, and it just ate my $20 without a single win (screw that).
Playloud said:
Ouch... That's harsh. I am only planning on bringing $300 to gamble. Betting green chips could really cut my trip short.
Playloud said:
So, for a red-chip Blackjack player, Harrah's is better for comps than MGM Mirage?
Also, how is Video Poker for comps? I recall reading that with VP, the house has only a small edge.
Also, how is Video Poker for comps? I recall reading that with VP, the house has only a small edge.
Carmine782 said:
It All Depends on You, Personally I live in Chicago, I dont make it out to Vegas That Often, and THe Best Blackjack Games i Found here in Chicago are at Harrah's Casinos. I couldnt really comment on Video Poker, I dont play it, I Just play craps/Blackjack/Carbbiean Stud
Carmine.
Carmine.
Last edited:
Your buy-in is a small factor,but if you buy in for multi-hundreds and that proceed to bet $5 or $10 a hand,it will actually hurt your comps.Pitbosses rate you for comps and little annoys them more than having to order a chip refill while some bozo is hogging hundreds of dollars worth of chips that he will never put into play.
shadroch said:
Your buy-in is a small factor,but if you buy in for multi-hundreds and that proceed to bet $5 or $10 a hand,it will actually hurt your comps.Pitbosses rate you for comps and little annoys them more than having to order a chip refill while some bozo is hogging hundreds of dollars worth of chips that he will never put into play.
From what I've learned,the most important factor is time at the table,then average bet,then your skill level,then your buy-in.
PB are upposed to check each table at least three times an hour,and note your average bet(they are supposed to watch several hands,but seldom do).
Formula goes like this Average bet times hands played(they are lazy and usually just call it 60 hands an hour)times hours played. So a $10 bettor would be $10x60=600X 3 hours= 1800 in action.They assume you will lose
5%,so the theoretic gain to the house is $90.They'll usually offer food comps for between a third and a half of your expected losses,so a $10 flat bettor can expect about $30-45 in food comps after three hours.Some casinos use different formulas but thats about the standard.
Now if you eliminate 20 hands played each hour,by taking a smoke break /bathroom break,you can safely raise your bets to $15 without risking a dime more,while seeing your comps go up by a third.
The pit rates your skill level as well,and obviously will comp an unskilled,superstitious player better than a skilled one.
PB are upposed to check each table at least three times an hour,and note your average bet(they are supposed to watch several hands,but seldom do).
Formula goes like this Average bet times hands played(they are lazy and usually just call it 60 hands an hour)times hours played. So a $10 bettor would be $10x60=600X 3 hours= 1800 in action.They assume you will lose
5%,so the theoretic gain to the house is $90.They'll usually offer food comps for between a third and a half of your expected losses,so a $10 flat bettor can expect about $30-45 in food comps after three hours.Some casinos use different formulas but thats about the standard.
Now if you eliminate 20 hands played each hour,by taking a smoke break /bathroom break,you can safely raise your bets to $15 without risking a dime more,while seeing your comps go up by a third.
The pit rates your skill level as well,and obviously will comp an unskilled,superstitious player better than a skilled one.
SilentBob420BMFJ said:
actually, the buy in is pretty important. i boosted my comps by buying in for about 3x as much as i was willing to lose, so $400 for a $10 flat bettor
remember, slots includes video poker, which can be just as good as bs blackjack, as long as you know how to play and you pick a good paytable, but these days the paytables are horrible at most places, and you sometimes have to go to $5 ($25 with the highly recommended max bet) just to find anything over 98%, but back in the 90s, it wasnt uncommon for there to be +ev paytables such as 100.76% with deuces
$300? i hope you can find $5 games, as you could easily lose $300 in less than 10 hours with $10 games
yes, video poker will earn you decent comps, but make sure you know how to play and pick a good paytable.. i highly recommend vpsm, it is the king for vp, nothing it cant do, and its $30 where in chicago do you live? i live in glen ellyn, and i go to nw indiana to play, as the casinos here suck, and arent 24 hours, but i heard harrahs has a game under .4%, but i dont believe it. if you do go to harrahs in joliet, and they do indeed have like a .36% house edge, can you view the discard tray, and are you allowed to jump in/out?
remember, slots includes video poker, which can be just as good as bs blackjack, as long as you know how to play and you pick a good paytable, but these days the paytables are horrible at most places, and you sometimes have to go to $5 ($25 with the highly recommended max bet) just to find anything over 98%, but back in the 90s, it wasnt uncommon for there to be +ev paytables such as 100.76% with deuces
$300? i hope you can find $5 games, as you could easily lose $300 in less than 10 hours with $10 games
yes, video poker will earn you decent comps, but make sure you know how to play and pick a good paytable.. i highly recommend vpsm, it is the king for vp, nothing it cant do, and its $30 where in chicago do you live? i live in glen ellyn, and i go to nw indiana to play, as the casinos here suck, and arent 24 hours, but i heard harrahs has a game under .4%, but i dont believe it. if you do go to harrahs in joliet, and they do indeed have like a .36% house edge, can you view the discard tray, and are you allowed to jump in/out?
shadroch said:
From what I've learned,the most important factor is time at the table,then average bet,then your skill level,then your buy-in.
PB are upposed to check each table at least three times an hour,and note your average bet(they are supposed to watch several hands,but seldom do).
Formula goes like this Average bet times hands played(they are lazy and usually just call it 60 hands an hour)times hours played. So a $10 bettor would be $10x60=600X 3 hours= 1800 in action.They assume you will lose
5%,so the theoretic gain to the house is $90.They'll usually offer food comps for between a third and a half of your expected losses,so a $10 flat bettor can expect about $30-45 in food comps after three hours.Some casinos use different formulas but thats about the standard.
Now if you eliminate 20 hands played each hour,by taking a smoke break /bathroom break,you can safely raise your bets to $15 without risking a dime more,while seeing your comps go up by a third.
The pit rates your skill level as well,and obviously will comp an unskilled,superstitious player better than a skilled one.
PB are upposed to check each table at least three times an hour,and note your average bet(they are supposed to watch several hands,but seldom do).
Formula goes like this Average bet times hands played(they are lazy and usually just call it 60 hands an hour)times hours played. So a $10 bettor would be $10x60=600X 3 hours= 1800 in action.They assume you will lose
5%,so the theoretic gain to the house is $90.They'll usually offer food comps for between a third and a half of your expected losses,so a $10 flat bettor can expect about $30-45 in food comps after three hours.Some casinos use different formulas but thats about the standard.
Now if you eliminate 20 hands played each hour,by taking a smoke break /bathroom break,you can safely raise your bets to $15 without risking a dime more,while seeing your comps go up by a third.
The pit rates your skill level as well,and obviously will comp an unskilled,superstitious player better than a skilled one.