Using CVBJ set up for Hi-Lo but using my UAPC system I am encountering enormous discrepancies between the two on the count and proper index play. I found one 6d shoe halfway through I was at near TC+6 UAPC but less than 3 Hi-Lo I. Just now I find myself at TC+1 UAPC but +4 Hi-Lo.
Aside from the betting issue which is huge I am finding some things are just not lining up together on the index moves as a result.
I was going to maybe take up or down a UAPC index move to kind of average it against what Hi Lo would do but there is a more serious math problem going on.
Any help would be appreciated. I do know UAPC uses .5 deck count adjustment vs. Hi-Lo.s full.
Aside from the betting issue which is huge I am finding some things are just not lining up together on the index moves as a result.
I was going to maybe take up or down a UAPC index move to kind of average it against what Hi Lo would do but there is a more serious math problem going on.
Any help would be appreciated. I do know UAPC uses .5 deck count adjustment vs. Hi-Lo.s full.
Last edited: