prankster said:
Thank you Fred Renzey!:joker:
With all due respect to Fred, don't thank him as much as the laws of probability lol.
In other words, it's just that is so much more fun to answer the question of the lilkihood of you being UP x (86 units) in 1 hr as oipposed to the often I'm down after a 100 hrs or so lol. Always much m ore fun to analyze how "good" one's is rather than how "bad", don't u think?
In other words, can you put a number on your liklihood of finishing up 86 units in 1 hr? Better to try to answer that question now than when you have lost half your roll in 100 hours kind oif thing.
Better to know now whether that was a +1 SD event, a +2 sd event, etc.
I'm a downer, I know lol. But, like, when I'd be down (on the internet) -3.5 to - 4 SD's after6-10K rounds, I'd tend to think the software has to be cr*p and probably cheating me. I'd tend to think the trend would never reverse. But it did tens of thousands rounds later.
Likewise, sometimes I'd be ahead +3.5 to + 4 Sd's after thousands of rounds and then I'd tend to think I'm "really good", maybe there is something wrong in the software they don't know about. Maybe get into that goofy thinking, "
I'm already ahead "crazy" from "expected" so I can count on losing my ass over the next 10K rounds to make up for it. (In other words bet less from fear lol).
I ramble. Trying to say never cared about "absolute" results in a time frame, (86 units in an hr), only cared about the lilkihood of it happening.