Paper nonesense can be real life sense
celadore said:
I'm a newbie :devil:
Was just trying to be nice about pointing out that he was talking nonsense.
The pivot point in a shoe for insurance/even money is recognized as +3 and of course it is +3 at the time you must make your decision on insurance and not whatever the count was when you made your bet decision.
Nic-picking the math there is no arguement with celadore. Your under that pivot point and you do not take insurance, but on an overbet or not overbetting but in getting away with a huge spread, there are other considerations and the math is closer than we are giving it credit for in this case.
A little math:
We take insurance when there is a .3333 chance or 1/3 chance of the dealer having a 10 card in the hole.
Off the top of the shoe there is a .3077 chance of that 10 being there.
In our example of a TC of +2 we are quite a bit closer (not there) to that pivot point with a .3269. Yes we are nicpicking at .0064 and as someone who often gets away with a spread of $25 to 2X$500, in this situation I take even money. I feel bad if the dealer does not have blackjack but know I would feel much worse should I have not insured my hand and landed up with a max bet push.
ihate17