Zen v Hi-Lo
- Thread starter SleightOfHand
- Start date
SleightOfHand said:
Really? The .01 BC difference is that much greater than .12 PE and .09 IC (taken from your website)?
PS: DD too
PS: DD too
also, with even just the I18, i dont think that DD sim is correct. zen should overtake hilo even with just the i18.
... and i wonder why did i change?
looking at this sims
im asking myself, does hi-low outperforms Zen?
A level 1 counting strategy vs a level 2.
I used to use hi-low and i switched, like sleight of hand said a 0.01% made all the difference?
What im getting is this: "Zen is worst than hi low in shoe games and Zen is slightly better than hi low in a single or doule deck"
Can anyone explain to me, where is the 10% of extra gain in this!
Dante
looking at this sims
im asking myself, does hi-low outperforms Zen?
A level 1 counting strategy vs a level 2.
I used to use hi-low and i switched, like sleight of hand said a 0.01% made all the difference?
What im getting is this: "Zen is worst than hi low in shoe games and Zen is slightly better than hi low in a single or doule deck"
Can anyone explain to me, where is the 10% of extra gain in this!
Dante
I think this is the cause of the problem. When i select full indeces, I get the regular surrender chart. But when I set it on S16 F4, the second set of indeces come up. I went to manage the strategy but nothing is like the second chart. I checked all the different charts for s16, multideck, etc. but nothing shows the chart on the rigth. Do you know whats going on QFIT?
Attachments
Hi, everyone, i have switched from hilo to zen for about 300 hours now, i have notice my winning are decreased compare to hilo, i play at a 8decks, 72%pen, H17 DAS DOA game, i use a 1-40 spread. I used the same ROR of 3% i had in hilo for the zen to generate my optimal betting. During play, I notice I bet less money then in hilo because higher counts comes less often in zen then in hilo. I use 18 and more indexes but most of them cant even be use because I barely get a hand over TC 11 at zen while lots of my indexes are above this TC. But in my cvcx generation I got a better win/hour with zen. 91.51$ vs 89.44$. In the recent simulation did by SleightOfHand, it was hilo that outperformed the zen in the type of shoes game I am playing, but me i got an opposed result. So is there a bug somewhere in my simulation considering the fact that hilo would do better in the game I am playing or does the zen really perform better. And as I mentioned, I notice a big lack of chance of pulling in big bets with zen compare tho hilo.
Win Loss %
if you look at your multiple deck sims, the win/loss % at TC of 0 are significantly off. The Hi lo sim is only -.13 , Also, the spread with the zen count reaches its max bet at a much lower advantage than the hi-lo sim, and this is probably why the score is lower. Do you possibly have different rules set for the two sims?
if you look at your multiple deck sims, the win/loss % at TC of 0 are significantly off. The Hi lo sim is only -.13 , Also, the spread with the zen count reaches its max bet at a much lower advantage than the hi-lo sim, and this is probably why the score is lower. Do you possibly have different rules set for the two sims?
well the conclusion i need to know is, if it will be better to backcount this kind of 8 decks game with a spread of 1-40 with hilo or with zen. considering the fact that i give both 3% ROR. the optimal betting ramp arent the same but i want to keep the ROR at 3%. like I said. the result on the simulation shows that zen wins more money. but i just dont get enough chances to pull the big bets out.