Blackjack and Card Counting Forums - BlackjackInfo.com funny you should mention that
 Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

#11
December 5th, 2011, 09:02 AM
 blackjack avenger Executive Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,435
N0 problem?

Reach N0 with a fixed spread and one has an 84% chance of being ahead.
4 N0 = 97.7%? 2Sd
9 N0 = 99.8%? 3Sd

I take it to mean as stated:
The number of hands needed to overcome one SD of bad luck.
__________________
Keys to Counting Success:
Mental toughness and discipline
Play quality games aggressively
Play 1,000 hours
Bet conservatively to last 1,000 hours

#12
December 5th, 2011, 09:47 AM
 sagefr0g Executive Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 3,201
N0 problem

Quote:
 Originally Posted by blackjack avenger Reach N0 with a fixed spread and one has an 84% chance of being ahead. I take it to mean as stated: The number of hands needed to overcome one SD of bad luck.
k...., damm i might learn something here, hopefully won't forget it soon as i learn it, lol.......

84% chance of being ahead, that's interesting, errrhhh i mean interesting to me, cause like i posted, i'd of thought it would of been a circa 68% chance of being ahead. what the heck am i missing here?
where's that extra 16% chances coming from? lol
hmmm, maybe he really does mean overcoming 1SD (like you say) of bad luck instead of 1lowSD, cause after all, 1SD of bad luck > 1lowSD of bad luck, errhh at least i think it is .
__________________
________________________________________

best regards,
mr fr0g MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
#13
December 5th, 2011, 10:19 AM
 blackjack avenger Executive Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,435
N0 problem

At 1 SD of N0 you have only a 16% chance of results falling below the 68% 1 SD range and the 16% above the range or 84% chance of winning.

100% of total results - 16% of losing results = 84% chance of winning.

Errr umm
I think

I also edited my previous post to include 4n0 & 9n0.
__________________
Keys to Counting Success:
Mental toughness and discipline
Play quality games aggressively
Play 1,000 hours
Bet conservatively to last 1,000 hours

#14
December 5th, 2011, 10:36 AM
 sagefr0g Executive Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 3,201

Quote:
 Originally Posted by blackjack avenger At 1 SD of N0 you have only a 16% chance of results falling below the 68% 1 SD range and the 16% above the range or 84% chance of winning. 100% of total results - 16% of losing results = 84% chance of winning. Errr umm I think I also edited my previous post to include 4n0 & 9n0.
lmao, well that was easy, but at least i learned something.
__________________
________________________________________

best regards,
mr fr0g MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:
#15
December 5th, 2011, 11:45 AM
 sagefr0g Executive Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 3,201
toxicity levels

in this post : http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/show...6&postcount=15
i was alluding to something, that i'm not even sure what the heck i'm alluding to, lol.
errhhh, i think in a nutshell, what i'm trying to ask is:
essentially is it possible to have some positive EV for some play and concurrent to that is it possible to have concurrently some 'standard deviation', such that the worst negative standard deviation one might expect to possibly happen, can never really happen because of the fact that the worst case scenario is so much less of a disaster than the standard deviation (derived from data) would lead one to expect?
if so, i'd think the bell curve would look sort of warped, errhh kind of skinny on the 'evil' side of the curve and fatter on the 'blessed' side of the curve. no?
possible?
edit: one thing that is happening data-wise is that relatively high variance has been happening of the 'good luck' nature, data-wise this drives up the standard deviation, but the thing is, i know the worst case scenario for a given play, and it can't even come close to the 'good luck' stuff that does happen.
so to me, it's as if the standard deviation derived from my data can't properly reflect the 'evil' side of the bell curve, sorta thing.
__________________
________________________________________

best regards,
mr fr0g MMOA honorary predator
STRENGTH - HONOR - HEART
that's my take on it your mileage may vary.
for senior citizen fuzzy count click link:

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums     General     Skilled Play - Card Counting, Advanced Strategies, Game Variations, Theory and Math     Blackjack - Online Casinos     Site Announcements and Administrative Issues Geographic Areas     Las Vegas     Western USA     Midwest USA     Southern USA     Eastern USA     Outside of USA Miscellaneous     Blackjack - CardCounter.com archives

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 PM.