Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Top Posters of the Month
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Menu
Log in
Register
What's new
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
Latest activity
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
2
21forme
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
A broken clock is right twice a day.
Yesterday at 6:51 PM
D
DSchles
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
It's easy to see from the BJA3 charts in the appendix. I wrote to Mike. Don
Yesterday at 6:38 PM
gronbog
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
I'm getting the same result (i.e. triple vs 6)
Yesterday at 6:09 PM
D
DSchles
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Incredible as it might sound, you actually appear to be right. :) Don
Yesterday at 5:41 PM
aceside
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Actually, I looked more closely at the Wizard strategy table for tripling and found a typo there. For the 6-deck Hit-17 game, the hand 8...
Yesterday at 2:23 AM
gronbog
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Fair enough. The Wizard generated his strategies for the complete set of rules as specified in the actual game being offered at the...
Monday at 3:28 AM
D
DSchles
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Incidentally, from a risk-averse perspective, you would surely take the even money. A certain 100% is surely more attractive than a...
Monday at 1:30 AM
D
DSchles
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Really sorry, but you're both wrong. You didn't read the rules of Triple Up 21. Rule #3 is : Blackjack pays even money. Good piece of...
Monday at 1:21 AM
aceside
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
It’s just because dealer busts less in 8 vs 5. Splitting always has priority over doubling, so split 4,4 vs 6.
Sunday at 10:20 PM
B
borya31
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
But why 8 against 6 is triple and 8 against 5 not? And is pair of 4s against 6 is it better split or triple?
Sunday at 10:16 PM
aceside
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
The hand 9 vs 2 is tripling but 8 vs 5 is not.
Sunday at 10:12 PM
B
borya31
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
I am surprised 9 against 2 and 8 against 5 are not triple down hand. And also surprised on splitting 2 3 7 against 8.but not surprised...
Sunday at 10:02 PM
aceside
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
It's a gambling website, so it is blocked for you. Just use the above Gronbog quadrupling table for tripling, except these four hands...
Sunday at 9:56 PM
B
borya31
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
Sorry can't open it my link is broken or blocked.
Sunday at 8:55 PM
gronbog
replied to the thread
Triple Down?
.
I just tried the Wizard of odds link and it works for me. It shows triple down strategies for various numbers of decks.
Sunday at 8:50 PM
What's new
Top