Team experience

Meyer

Member
Deviations from Basic are what the pit now looks for now more than anything else in confirming counters at the table. We have it from an inside source that dealers and critters are instructed not only in Basic, but also the Illustrious 18, and told to call out certain deviations. But they don't call them all out. Too many people vary their play with certain hands like 12 vs 3, 13 vs 2, even 16 vs 10, so those deviations are not usually called out. Splitting T's will always get called out. (Hint: if you split T's and it's not called out, immediately leave after the play because you will be backed off or barred very soon.) If they've noticed a player who appears to know basic strategy (again, these players are VERY easy to spot in a short amount of time), and that player is making deviations consistent with the Ill. 18, but then there's another deviation with which they dealer isn't familiar, they call that out almost always. Like doubling S20 vs 5 or 6. "Doubling soft twenty!!" (a play which also seems to drive the other players at the table nuts), or "Doubling seven!!" (a play like this will cause the dealer to lean back towards the pit critters when he yells it, because he want's to be dang sure the pit knows he's got a live one at the table).

Some people think that making a lot of deviations in basic strategy is "cover", that since their plays are all over the place they must look like an idiot. Far from it. Deviations in basic strategy are a magnet. Proper cover should be making as few deviations from basic as possible.

Sometimes the sky will see deviations and want to watch more closely. They will switch out the dealer with another whom they've told NOT to call out any plays so as not to scare off the counter. And they watch. You should be very wary when deviations are not being called out by one dealer that were being called out from a different dealer.

Here's a true story: My team was on a cruise which had some juicy games. It was a 3-day cruise, so we decided to just hit 'em hard for those 3 days. The first day, I was solo-playing a deeply dealt double-deck game dealt face up (the other team members were hitting some shuffles). They used the same rules at the double-deck game as they did at the shoe games on the ship, so it was like a candy store. DAS, S17, Resplit Aces, LS, dealt down to less than 1/2 deck -- yummy, yummy, yummy. So the first day, the dealers made some of the usual calls ("black action", "Insuring a Seven", etc). I was eating that game up and couldn't stop and didn't care what was being called out. Second day, after about 3 hours I noticed that the dealers weren't calling anything out except cashing in and coloring up. "Oh well, different shift, must've been trained differently" I thought. It should've raised some warning bells, but I didn't know at the time.

After I had been playing about 5 hours that second day, I suddenly noticed 4 men in suits directly behind me. One was shorter than the others and right behind my ear he said "Please step away from the table". Instead of getting up, I just turned around and said "Can I help you?" He said, "I must ask you to leave the table." I said "Why? Is something wrong?" He smiled, looking almost embarrassed, and said "No, not at all. Your game is just too strong for us. We're going to have to ask you not to play blackjack here anymore. You can play any other game in the casino area, just not blackjack. Might I suggest craps?" It wasn't the first time I'd been backed off, or barred for that matter. But there was something different about the way this guy mentioned craps, almost as if he wanted me to play craps specifically.

Otherwise, it was typical "backing off" stuff. I walked around casually for a bit, signaling the other players that I was busted. Well, the ship wasn't docking until the next morning, so I took a couple of hundred of my own money (not the team's) and camped out at a craps game, covertly watching the other players to make sure they weren't busted either. They staggered their leaving about 30 minutes apart so as to be not too noticeable, but none of them were approached by suits before they left. Since I was the only one playing at a pitch game, maybe I was the only one caught.

After about 30 minutes (for some reason I kept winning at craps -- I was up about $300 -- karma I guess) the short suited guy came up to me. "Having fun?" he said. I said, "You have this way of sneaking up on people, it's not a very sociable habit. Are you going to back me off craps too?" I realized now why he wanted me to play craps. "No, you can play craps all you want. And please do." I laughed and rolled the dice. After a fairly awkward minute of silence he said, "I'm curious. We analyzed your tape, but it didn't seem to correlate to the Hi-Lo. What system were you using." So that was it. He wanted information.

I thought for a minute. It was probably a rare thing for him to have an opportunity to talk to a real counter, and I found the opportunity to talk to him just as intriguing. I also realized that I couldn't come back anyway (without a very good disguise, at least), so I might as well try to get some info in exchange. The way this was set up, I'm sure that's what he had planned. It seemed like a golden opportunity. I said, "Tell you what. I'll tell you the counting system I was using if you tell me how you caught me." He smiled a thousand-watt smile and said "Deal!" as he held out his hand to shake mine. Obviously he was delighted, and I must admit I was a little excited too. "I was using the RPC, with about 50 index numbers. No fancy stuff, you just had a nice double-deck game". He said "Ahhhh, Revere Point Count." That surprised me a little. I didn't know they were trained different counting systems. I thought all these guys knew was the Hi-Lo. I said "Actually what I do is half the tags. Kind of an RPC-Halves. You know the Halves count?" He shook his head, "I don't know the count, but I know of it." I said, "Basically, I count two's and seven's as a half-point each. The other tag values are +1 and -1 instead of +2 and -2. This way, the running count is smaller, and the index numbers are smaller too."

Then I said "Ok, your turn. What gave me away." He said, "You doubled 9 vs 8." I said "Really, I know there's more to it than that." He said, "Yes, actualy, it was a two-step process. The last shift you played on saw you won big, more than a usual swing for a double-deck game, so the manager on duty was suspicious. He called me in this morning to review the tapes. I noticed your betting patterns looked like a progression scheme, but they tended to be higher when the count was high, and low when the count was low. But it wasn't a straight correlation so we couldn't be sure. Then I started watching your plays." I asked "Exactly when did you know for sure." He said "Like I said, when you doubled 9 vs 8. That's not part of the Illustrious 18 so I had to look up the index and recount the shoe up to that point to be sure. That was a strong play." "Evidently too strong" I said. "One more question" I said. "I noticed that this morning the dealers weren't calling out any plays that they normally do." "Yeah, I told them not to" he said. "Didn't want to scare you off before we had you." "Sneaky" I said, and he grinned again. I picked up my chips to leave, and he held out his hand again. "Thanks, and good luck to you. Just not on our boat."

In retrospect, I believe I got a lot more information from him than he got from me. At most, he learned that people actually do use more than just the Hi-Lo. But I learned a valuable lesson about deviations from Basic.

Since then, we made it a point to recruit a former dealer to the team, and he is still in contact with the SM at his old casino (which we've promised not to hit). I didn't tell him the above story until after he told us that they were trained in Basic and the Ill. 18 and specifically to watch for deviations. I would say that's fairly good corroboration.

Take my advice. Betting will tip them off. Deviations will get you caught.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cardcounter0

Well-Known Member
Meyer said:
Every word of it was true.
Hahahaha. Where to start ???

on MY TEAM anyone seen having friendly conversations with casino employees, or admiting to ANYONE that they count, would be found in a hole out in the desert.

you are stuck on a cruise ship, and you ADMIT to casino employees what you are doing? you don't think they are not going back to the tapes, seeing who you associate with, who you entered with, who you have shared rooms with, who you ate dinner with, who seems to always happen to walk up to your table, etc. etc. etc. You risked the entire team's picture getting flyered to every casino in the country simply because some rube pit critter "finally" recognized you where counting?

We analyzed your tape, but it didn't seem to correlate to the Hi-Lo.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Do you think they picked up on the .02% difference in betting correlation, or was it the 1 time out of 100 that RPC indicates a deviation that HiLo doesn't?

If you go back with your clever disguise, may I suggest just painting SUCKER on your forehead?
 

Meyer

Member
cardcounter0 said:
Hahahaha. Where to start ???
Why the hostility? I was just relating an experience I had in the hopes of shedding some light on what the sky watched for. Sorry if it was a bit much for you.

on MY TEAM anyone seen having friendly conversations with casino employees, or admiting to ANYONE that they count, would be found in a hole out in the desert.
Did you miss the fact that this was AFTER I was already backed off? He already knew I was counter, and he had already backed me off because of it. I didn't give any information about the team, or that I was even on a team, all I told him was the count that I used and how many index numbers. Seems like very little information to give up, if you ask me.

We had a team meeting after this incident, and everyone on the team thought the information I obtained was well worth it. No one was even the slightest upset that I had that conversation, and considered it a great opportunity that was taken advantage of.

you are stuck on a cruise ship, and you ADMIT to casino employees what you are doing?
*sigh* Again, they already knew I was a counter. The only thing he asked for was which count I was using, and he offered a lot of information in return. In fact, if his superiors found out what he told me, he might have been fired. It was much riskier for him than me. The only thing he could have done that he hadn't done already was to trespass me, but that would have been a little difficult considering we were on the 2nd day of a 3-day cruise.

you don't think they are not going back to the tapes, seeing who you associate with, who you entered with, who you have shared rooms with, who you ate dinner with, who seems to always happen to walk up to your table, etc. etc. etc. You risked the entire team's picture getting flyered to every casino in the country simply because some rube pit critter "finally" recognized you where counting?
You must have a different team policy than we do. We don't share rooms, we don't eat together, we don't arrive together, we don't leave together, we don't talk to each other, and no two team members play at the same table more than once at any casino. If you do any of those things, you need to seriously reconsider your team approach. They could have watched all the tapes they wanted, but they wouldn't have found any associations between any of us, casual or otherwise. Everyone on our team has been backed off or barred, but no two of us has ever been backed off or barred at the same casino.

We analyzed your tape, but it didn't seem to correlate to the Hi-Lo.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Do you think they picked up on the .02% difference in betting correlation, or was it the 1 time out of 100 that RPC indicates a deviation that HiLo doesn't?
You didn't read the original text very carefully, did you. That's not the quote, and that's not what he said. Here's what he really said: "I noticed your betting patterns looked like a progression scheme, but they tended to be higher when the count was high, and low when the count was low. But it wasn't a straight correlation so we couldn't be sure." The correlation was between the count and the betting, not between the Hi-Lo and the RPC. I was using a deliberate progression cover-betting scheme, which is why they weren't sure on the betting alone

If you're going to flame someone, at least get your facts straight. But I guess facts are not important when you're flaming.

If you go back with your clever disguise, may I suggest just painting SUCKER on your forehead?
I sense a lot of hostility in your post. As far as I can tell, I've said nothing to justify your hostility, at least until this post. If you have some constructive criticism, by all means give it. But so far it's all been hot air.
 

cardcounter0

Well-Known Member
"I noticed your betting patterns looked like a progression scheme, but they tended to be higher when the count was high, and low when the count was low. But it wasn't a straight correlation so we couldn't be sure."

Soooo... I would explain things to you since it is obvious you have been playing ever since the movie 21 came out :laugh: but I will point ONE thing out, maybe you will learn from it. Try to keep your spew of BS level down, and LISTEN:

You were playing at a shop that was totally clueless. There whole detection method is wait until someone wins a substantial amount of money, and then wait even longer while hours and hours of tape are analyzed ... and even then "it wasn't a straight correlation so we couldn't be sure" ... which means even the smallest amount of cover play would throw them off for an even longer session.

They backed you off, then you helped them tremendously, by CONFIRMING that YES YOU WERE COUNTING. They were still in doubt, WTF do you think the "friendly" chit-chat was about? Starting to sink in?

Oh, and you were so clever, you learned that the eye in the sky at even the most clueless cruise ship is aware of other counting systems besides HiLo. WoooooHooooo!!!! LISTEN UP:

It doesn't matter if you are using HiLo, RED7, RPC, USTON ULTIMATE, or have a computer in your shoe -- someone using a good BC count system counting along and noticing that you bet substantially more when the count is good, and less when the count is bad -- should be able to quickly realize this isn't just happenstance and know you are counting -- this place was having a hard time even determining that!!! So you let them know for sure. Good Job.

Oh, as far as the knowledge of other counts, Did I ever tell you about the time the pit boss asked me if I knew Arnold Snyder? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

ATTENTION TO BASIC STRATEGY DEVIATIONS: Since 90% of the clueless donkeys that play blackjack don't know correct basic strategy, trying to key in on the deviations to detect counters is useless. The casino has another ulterior motive requiring the dealer to call out: to stop player/dealer collusion. Suppose the dealer peaks, sees he has a 4 on the top of the deck, and signals the player to hit his 17. Player wins hand, gets paid, and casino never has a clue it got cheated out of a bet. Calling out the unusual plays makes the funny business "business" a little bit harder.

Congrats at getting a former dealer (any knowledgable players want to chime in on how much they know) that talks to a pit critter (hopefully one that knows how to tie his own shoes). Did I ever tell you about the time the drunk that worked eye-in-the-sky security at a neighboring casino sat beside me at the competitions bj table and proceeded to "teach" me how to count by using his fingers? :laugh:
 
Last edited:

cardcounter0

Well-Known Member
After a fairly awkward minute of silence he said, "I'm curious. We analyzed your tape, but it didn't seem to correlate to the Hi-Lo. What system were you using." So that was it. He wanted information.
I guess this is just my imagination from your original post. Sorry that I was so busy flaming that I MISQUOTED you. hahahaha.
 

MAZ

Well-Known Member
Alright, forget stating the obvious about this nonsensical story, where the hell did you find a cruise ship with those rules and penetration. I could have stopped reading the story right there and known what was coming was just a cute little fairy tale. The good news is you have earned a nomination to the best creative writing in a thread award. There is some stiff competition but if you keep coming up with excuses for your story I'd have to say you will be a front runner.

And by the way if any of your story has any truth to it, you fail newbie counter 101. You admit to nothing. Typically the counter will have an intelligence edge on those that are observing. That may not be the case here.
 

cardcounter0

Well-Known Member
I agree. I am torn between someone just watched the movie 21 BS fantasy, but with the slight possibility one of the dumbest people ever had a conversation with a casino employee and thought he had outfoxed somebody.
 

Meyer

Member
Alright, I see that you're intent on arguing, so I'll respond one more time since you still don't get it.

cardcounter0 said:
Soooo... I would explain things to you since it is obvious you have been playing ever since the movie 21 came out :laugh:
Just a slight correction. I've been playing on BJ teams for more than 15 years, and solo for 5 years before that.

Try to keep your spew of BS level down
I've told a story that actually happened to me, and corrected you when you misquoted it and just plain got it wrong. If that's BS to you, you must smell it a lot.

You were playing at a shop that was totally clueless.
Possibly. At least the shift before I was backed off was clueless.

There whole detection method
BTW, it's "their", not "there"
wait even longer while hours and hours of tape are analyzed
No one said they analyzed "hours and hours" of tape. It could have only been 15 or 20 minutes for all I know. Again, you're injecting things that were not in the original text.

which means even the smallest amount of cover play would throw them off for an even longer session.
I use a fairly complex progression cover-betting scheme. I would hardly call it "the smallest amount of cover play". I learned almost immediately how obvious betting strictly with the count can be. It takes a very elaborate scheme to provide adequate cover while still getting the money down when you need to.

They backed you off, then you helped them tremendously, by CONFIRMING that YES YOU WERE COUNTING. They were still in doubt
No they weren't. They already knew I was a counter because of the deviations from basic strategy that I made. The betting threw them a little, but the deviations gave me away. And I point out once more that this was the point of telling the story in the first place. I've said it now quite a few times. Do you get it yet?

Oh, and you were so clever, you learned that the eye in the sky at even the most clueless cruise ship is aware of other counting systems besides HiLo. WoooooHooooo!!!!
Again you weren't paying attention. What I learned, first-hand, is that deviations from basic strategy will give you away as clearly as betting. BTW, have you learned first-hand from a sky critter anything at all, or are you content with postulations and assumptions?

It doesn't matter if you are using HiLo, RED7, RPC, USTON ULTIMATE, or have a computer in your shoe -- someone using a good BC count system counting along and noticing that you bet substantially more when the count is good, and less when the count is bad -- should be able to quickly realize this isn't just happenstance and know you are counting
Hence my elaborate cover-betting scheme. You keep forgetting that part?

Oh, as far as the knowledge of other counts, Did I ever tell you about the time the pit boss asked me if I knew Arnold Snyder? :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
It is to laugh.

ATTENTION TO BASIC STRATEGY DEVIATIONS: Since 90% of the clueless donkeys that play blackjack don't know correct basic strategy, trying to key in on the deviations to detect counters is useless.
Quite the contrary. And the whole point of my story. Tell you what: Why don't you add splitting Tens to your repertoire and get back to us with how that theory is working out for you.

The casino has another ulterior motive requiring the dealer to call out: to stop player/dealer collusion.
Yes, as I pointed out at the beginning of my first post. But I guess you missed that part too.

I guess this is just my imagination from your original post. Sorry that I was so busy flaming that I MISQUOTED you. hahahaha.
Again, the correlation to which he was referring was between the betting and the count, which to him was the Hi-Lo. In his mind I just HAD to be using a different count because the betting didn't match up. I know that there is for all practical purposes no difference in betting correlation between counting systems (they're all between 96% and 99%), but he obviously thought I was using a different count. It was just a coincidence that I wasn't actually using the Hi-Lo. I didn't explain my cover-betting strategy; in fact, all I did was probably convince him that different counts correlate differently with betting. I don't know what he thought. But I DO know that the strategy deviations is what finally gave me away.

Ok, I've had enough fun for today. Go ahead, flame me some more, twist some more facts to suit you, develop that fantasy world a little better, whatever makes you happy. I've got better things to do than continue to respond to such nonsense, which I've probably done too much of anyway. :flame:
 
Maz

I am with you....I have never heard of a cruise ship offering such games.

Also, how is it they never picked up on the other team members:confused:

Meyer is spinning a good one:laugh:

I did have a dealer brought in to check my play and she then confronted me about my skillz, I said nothing. She then came back that evening and sat at my table to play, allowed at this casino, told me how good she knew I was and then proceeded to follow my bet pattern for the rest of the night:eek: The next day I was half shoed and pref shuffled:( But I still found a way to kick their arse:)

This last weekend on a great DD I took an aggressive insurance bet, won it, and the dealer looked at me with incredulity and asked, "Was that just a hunch...or something else"? "A hunch, what else would it be", I said, while silently thinking...OhOoo.

CP
 

rollem411

Well-Known Member
Meyer said:
No they weren't. They already knew I was a counter because of the deviations from basic strategy that I made. The betting threw them a little, but the deviations gave me away. And I point out once more that this was the point of telling the story in the first place. I've said it now quite a few times. Do you get it yet?
They can never be 100% sure until you admitted that you were counting. Think about how different they would have felt if you played dumb as opposed to admitting it.
 
Top