Sonny said:
Many of the authors don't give any indication of their level of play. One of the guys at my work brags that he's been winning for the past 5 years. I asked him how many time he plays and he said "about two weekends per year." Sometimes these authors are purposely deceitful or will exaggerate their claims in order to sell books. Again, that's why it is so important to know the facts before you decide. Don't put your faith in someone's empirical evidence, look at the facts.
I know that Walter Thomason, for instance, has spent quite a bit of time both playing and researching, and Jay Moore, another author I've read, recorded his results for an year of play at 5 hours per day, two days per week. I'm sure that's probably more than many people on here play!
I also was curious about one other thing. . .
Why do counters not put any stock into the numbers when it comes to how often you will have certain numbers of winning/losing streaks? Consider this. . .
Simulate a million hands or however many you want to simulate. Then determine whether or not, after 4 losing hands, the player wins the 5th hand more often than he loses it. If he does in fact win more often than the loses then let that moment for your big bet.
Flat bet until 4 losses and then bet 10 units. While you can't guarantee that you will win any individual bet, if on average you will win more of that particular bet than you lose then it seems like, over the long run, you will come out ahead.