Lucky Ladies

D

dukejava1

New Member
#4
#4
Thanks,so using hi/lo a true count of +4 makes money on lucky ladies,if this is accurate I should start a progression betting system starting at +4.
 
Sonny

Sonny

Well-Known Member
#5
#5
dukejava1 said:
...I should start a progression betting system starting at +4.
Click to expand...
No, just bet the table max ($25) every time the bet is positive. The advantage is so big that a progression system will just reduce your profit.

-Sonny-
 
2

21forme

Well-Known Member
#6
#6
dukejava1 said:
Thanks,so using hi/lo a true count of +4 makes money on lucky ladies,if this is accurate I should start a progression betting system starting at +4.
Click to expand...
Where did you get +4 as being profitable?
 
E

EmeraldCityBJ

Well-Known Member
#8
#8
Sonny said:
No, just bet the table max ($25) every time the bet is positive. The advantage is so big that a progression system will just reduce your profit.

-Sonny-
Click to expand...
Since a significant chunk of the EV in this game is from the top payouts (two Queen of Hearts - preferably with a dealer BJ), you also want to know the aggregate payout. For example, if the max bet is $25, but the per hand aggregate is $5,000, you're only going to get 200:1 rather than 1000:1 on the top payout. I would recommend placing a bet which is 1/1000 of the aggregate. The aggregate (or max payout) is usually posted at the table. If you don't see it there, ask.
 
zengrifter

zengrifter

Banned
#9
#9
EmeraldCityBJ said:
Since a significant chunk of the EV in this game is from the top payouts (two Queen of Hearts - preferably with a dealer BJ), you also want to know the aggregate payout. For example, if the max bet is $25, but the per hand aggregate is $5,000, you're only going to get 200:1 rather than 1000:1 on the top payout. I would recommend placing a bet which is 1/1000 of the aggregate. The aggregate (or max payout) is usually posted at the table. If you don't see it there, ask.
Click to expand...
That would only be $5.00 bet. He should mostly bet the full $25. zg
 
E

EmeraldCityBJ

Well-Known Member
#15
#15
aslan said:
Question: Would the LL bet be just as profitable at +7 in a 6 or 8 deck game
Click to expand...
Assuming the pay schedule is constant, the house edge is lower with more decks (or, the player edge is higher if the count is high).
 
zengrifter

zengrifter

Banned
#17
#17
rdorange said:
I've never seen the LL offered in DD. I have only seen this side bet offered on shoe games. Anybody else?
Click to expand...
Many 2D games in LV offer it. I hit QQh w/ 25 bet 4 times in 90-days (all 2D), in 2005 when I played it regulary. zg
 
Last edited:
R

rollem411

Well-Known Member
#20
#20
Say you get a +7 count at a LL table. Since the advantage to the player is so significant has anyone tried placing a max side bet in another players spot to make the most of it? EV would rise a sh*t load. I don't know if they will even allow this though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top