QFIT
Well-Known Member
My point or question is whether tourney-style short-sampling betting is stronger than a 10% edge in 30 hands, am mojority of the time. zg
Depends on who wins the coin flip and gets to bet last.
My point or question is whether tourney-style short-sampling betting is stronger than a 10% edge in 30 hands, am mojority of the time. zg
OK, here's the set-up, the winner gets $10,000:
LVHCM can see the holecarder, Ken cannot.
LVHCM flat bets, Ken bets turney-strategy.
30-hands. Who has the advantage towards winning? zg
Stalker would have a 11+% edge. zgKen would, the flat-bet rule for LVHCM would be too much to overcome, even with seeing the hole-card.
Stalker would have a 11+% edge. zg
Stalker would have a 11+% edge. zg
Funny you should mention software. My worthless software supports holecarding practice, simulation and strategy generation. But the software you BJFO folk keep pushing supports none of these. Or any other expert methods. That's "The Truth."
Hey, ghost of Stalker - you speak garbage - there would be no basic holecard strategy without the software. Or do you and your ilk just pull it out of your A** like you do your words? zgFunny that there's not one professional holecarder on the planet that used "software" to better their game.
Funnier still you dance around the subject and come up with zero proof of your baseless allegations. Typical behavior from the autistic mental case.
Hey, ghost of Stalker - you speak garbage - there would be no basic holecard strategy without the software. Or do you and your ilk just pull it out of your A** like you do your words? zg
What a sorry sack you are - now you are saying that software was not used to develop holecard strategy?? Its the juice, man, you are losing it!So now QFIT's worthless software created the strategy? LMAO.
I will make one unconditional promise - If I should ever find myself again in a room with either you and your brown teeth, or the autistic computer jockey, it won't be a pleasant experience for either one of you.
What a sorry sack you are - now you are saying that software was not used to develop holecard strategy?? Its the juice, man, you are losing it!I'll make YOU a promise - When I SEE YOU I will remind you of your promise and then I'll let everyone here know how you WIMPED OUT! z:laugh:g
I'd let everyone at Fight Club know too, but your too much of a wuss to let me post there.
So now QFIT's worthless software created the strategy? LMAO.
I will make one unconditional promise - If I should ever find myself again in a room with either you and your brown teeth, or the autistic computer jockey, it won't be a pleasant experience for either one of you.
I couldn't imagine anyone enjoying being in a room with you. :vomit:
Not a chance, when you wuss out your only excuse will be your roid-shriveled balls.Good then, I'll be looking forward to seeing you again. Best bring some of your FBI "pals".
Anyone who reads this thread will feel sorry for you.All of those drugs must have affected your reading comprehension as well as your teeth...to suggest QFIT had anything to do developing holecard strategy is beyond absurd.
Right, "trolling" at Fight Club. Thats a sorry excuse, since YOU are the moderator. I guess you are as worthless there as anywhere else, here for instance. Otherwise YOU are the moderator, show show some cajunes and email me my new password.The only person who determines who can post of BJFO is Arnold, so take it up with him. I reckon he tired of a convicted conman trolling for new victims on his site...can't say I blame him.
That's cute, vintage Stalker. zgI don't know...your mother wasn't complaining last time I skull-fu cked her.
All of those drugs must have affected your reading comprehension as well as your teeth...to suggest QFIT had anything to do developing holecard strategy is beyond absurd.
Funny that there's not one professional holecarder on the planet that used "software" to better their game.
I just want to be clear about this. You're saying that the zengrifter who thinks that tangential, semantic argumentation is clever and relevant is MORE lucid than the pre-psychadelics zengrifter? I wonder what that guy was like, a bag of hammers?The difference between me and you is that psychedelics IMPROVE lucidity and comprehension...
No, more like a box of rocks. zgI just want to be clear about this. You're saying that the zengrifter who thinks that tangential, semantic argumentation is clever and relevant is MORE lucid than the pre-psychadelics zengrifter? I wonder what that guy was like, a bag of hammers?
For example, your rant had nothing to do with QFIT software, though its the best on the market. YOU said that holecarders never ever "used software" to figure out the game/strategy. Words fresh out of your A**!
Originally Posted by QFIT View Post
Funny you should mention software. My worthless software supports holecarding practice, simulation and strategy generation.
In the meantime, I thought you were banned here. Maybe I'm mistaken, I'll need to take a new poll. zg