Recent content by daveh0

Renzy's book. If there are more 10 on the board than babies, it says to hit.

I never even considered that. Makes sense. Hypothetically, if you were able to play the same number of hands per hour as in a shoe-dealt game, does my theory hold any water?

It is starting to seem to me that if you are not counting, your best shot is playing in a game where the cards played in previous hands do not have any effect on your current hand. I'm thinking this because I feel like BS is a very bad way to play in extremely high or extremely low counts. At...

First of all, I just want to say thanks for taking the time to help me get my head around this concept. I'm not trying to be thick-skulled or argumentative. I just want to be sure I completely understand these concepts (not just believe them) before moving on to more advanced play. According...

Right, I read that part in the book. So here is where my mind was at when I first posted the question: I stand with 12 against a 5 because basic strategy dictates that by hitting, the odds are greater that I will either bust or draw to a losing hand than if I stand and let the dealer bust...

In his book, Fred Renzey states and attempts to prove that the way in which other players at the table play their hands will have no effect on whether you win or lose. He states that this is true because the order in which the cards come out of the shoe is still random... so if the player before...