Recent content by Eli M

You're not funny. I ran a stimulation and I lost more in 100 sessions than i would win. http://bettingsystemsimulator.com

How is that a strategy? By betting 1 $ twice and 3$ after that you are not making back the money you have lost already. What you're basically doing is losing your money at a slower pace.

Again no logical argument lol

Let's say you have 102,300$ and split it into 100 different bankrolls/sessions of 1023$ each. Each sessions goal is to reach 2046$ and cashout by betting 1$ and doubling you losses which means you would need a 10 in a row losing streak to lose a session. In some sessions you will have a losing...

Do you read what I write or you just repeat the same thing over and over again. I'm not talking only about the martingale strategy, there's a reason why I do the 1023$ sessions. I know obviously that if i use only the martingale strategy I will end up by losing.

I didn't mention that you should forget about doubling and splitting. Only hitting and standing. The casino will have a bigger edge on me but not enough to cause 10 hands in a row losses very often.

It's easy to say it's not going to work. I'm looking for mathematical proof but I'm not hearing any logic from you.

I don't think you're understanding me. The reason why I do 1023$ sessions and cashout at 2046$ is because at 1023$ I need to lose 10 hands to lose all my bankroll. There will be more sessions that I will reach 2046$ and cashout than losing 10 times in a row. So you're wrong in the long run I...

I know everyone says the martingale strategy won't work but can you please explain it to me if I do it this way? I have a casino where the table minimum is 1$ and the max is 5000$. I bet 1$ and double every loss. Now what are the chances that I lose 10 hands in a row before winning 1023 times...