I did read the posts and did not find an answer that was directly on point. There were a few closely related posts, similar to the one sonny posted, but there was none on point to the slight variations I asked about. I believe it was a reasonable question since I was still betting with a...
Thanks Sonnny. That is helpful. It is somewhat different than my proposed idea though, which is a quasi-martingale in that it only bets on advantages from a 1-4 unit spread. In other words, there is no chance of going broke like you mentioned.
However, I do see that this is still less than...
What are you talking about? Did you even read the thread? Zerg posted a well-thought and reasoned critique of the idea and I thanked him for it as it was very helpful.
The post was a question looking by a for a serious and thoughtful response, not a statement to go unchallenged by any...
I posted this in the Voodoo forum specifically because Martingale is a fallacy and I wanted to know how the method I proposed would work. I believe it was a different type of question than the many martingale posts I read and thus decided to post it. Either way, How can you rant on someone for...
Zerg,
So, basically the martingale with a statistical advantage isn't a "losing" strategy, but it simply isn't the optimal strategy and therefore not the best is basically what I am getting.
Thanks for the answer and explanation. It is sometimes difficult to get an answer around here...
We've all heard of the martingale fallacy and how it is a common failure. However, I've considered doing a limited martingale type only when back counting and when I have an advantage.
For example: Backcount until the count gets to +1/+2 TC, then play one betting unit and double until lost...
Depends on the level 2 count. I would recommend sticking with a level 1 count though. Its easier and less mistakes equals greater EV. The more difficult the system of counting, the greater chances of mistakes in counting/betting and that will reduce your EV.
Know of any Casinos in the Midwest other than Mystic that offers the over/under 13 bet?
Also, if your at a table with over/under 13 betting, would you recommend a hi/lo count or would you recommend using one of Snyder's over/under 13 as more advantageous?
Woops! Apologies to Midwestplayer for making a similar username. I officially changed mine (not as easy as it sounds); hopefully there is not a similar name to this one!
Seems to be a tough crowd here. One post and I'm questioned as a casino spy and told I need to change my name because of some former player. :whip:
I've tried training a couple people whom I trust, but they seem to lose interest and aren't willing to spend the time memorizing the charts and...