Hi all,
I have a curious statistical question for ya'll.
Theoretically speaking wouldn't the following be true:
1) if a game was exactly breakeven (Win/hr = $0.00) and had a std/hr > $0.00 then RoR = 100% given an infinite number of hours of play.
but if #1 true then wouldn't #2 be true as well
2) Everygame with a std/hr > $0.00 has a RoR = 100% given an infinite number of hours.
Should I not even bother with the idea of infinite hours of play and just accept the fact that the probability of a losing streak of -$9999999999999999... while very nearly impossible is not 0%, but is still virtually impossible.
I feel like this is starting to maybe stumble into N-zero territory, is that right? Can you please recommend a book for N0 reading?
Thanks in Advance.
I have a curious statistical question for ya'll.
Theoretically speaking wouldn't the following be true:
1) if a game was exactly breakeven (Win/hr = $0.00) and had a std/hr > $0.00 then RoR = 100% given an infinite number of hours of play.
but if #1 true then wouldn't #2 be true as well
2) Everygame with a std/hr > $0.00 has a RoR = 100% given an infinite number of hours.
Should I not even bother with the idea of infinite hours of play and just accept the fact that the probability of a losing streak of -$9999999999999999... while very nearly impossible is not 0%, but is still virtually impossible.
I feel like this is starting to maybe stumble into N-zero territory, is that right? Can you please recommend a book for N0 reading?
Thanks in Advance.