I doubt they are legal. Most jurisdictions model their gambling laws off of Nevada, and the UK is a commonlaw jurisdiction. But, you should check it out. Findlaw.org might help you find the statute.karl said:Are electronic devices used to gain an advantage in a casino (Blackjack, roulette etc) legal? I mean is it possible to be found guilty of a crime for using such devices within UK casinos?
Karl
This definitely is not correct in Nevada, and I would suspect it's not true in the UK because everyone models their gaming laws after Nevada.newb99 said:It depends what they do. If they interefere with a game or alter it in anyway it would be cheating. If all they do is process information that is readily available, ie could calculate the %age probability of winning the hand you've been dealt in three card poker, it'd probably be OK (not illegal). I think though you'd probably be asked not to use it, and if you pressed the point would politely be shown the door and have your membership terminated.
Everyone? I think, sir, you over estimate the influence of the Stars and Stripes. If that is in fact the case, how is it that casinos in AC are not free to bar skilled players as those in LV do? A small matter of a legal ruling I believe?moo321 said:This definitely is not correct in Nevada, and I would suspect it's not true in the UK because everyone models their gaming laws after Nevada.
That was a court ruling. But the statute is modeled after the ones in Nevada. I'm not saying everything is exactly the same, but most jurisdictions model themselves after Nevada.newb99 said:Everyone? I think, sir, you over estimate the influence of the Stars and Stripes. If that is in fact the case, how is it that casinos in AC are not free to bar skilled players as those in LV do? A small matter of a legal ruling I believe?
![]()
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure we don't have any statues regarding cheating in casinos here in the UK - if someone was caught, and the crown prosecution service did decide to press charges, I'm not even sure what the incumbent would be charged with? Something around attempting to obtain a financial gain through fraudulent means perhaps?moo321 said:That was a court ruling. But the statute is modeled after the ones in Nevada. I'm not saying everything is exactly the same, but most jurisdictions model themselves after Nevada.
The rules about gambling contracts are very different across the US. Where I live, gambling contracts are not enforceable, and in fact you can sue to recover money lost gambling.newb99 said:I'm not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure we don't have any statues regarding cheating in casinos here in the UK - if someone was caught, and the crown prosecution service did decide to press charges, I'm not even sure what the incumbent would be charged with? Something around attempting to obtain a financial gain through fraudulent means perhaps?
I'm not sure though that charges would be pressed. In the UK gambling carries a very different amount of weight within law from that of Nevada and probably lots of the other States of the Union. Debts incurred through gambling, or for the purpose of gambling, are not enforceable in the civil courts (UK contract law doesn't cover any such agreements), whereas in Nevada I believe that unpaid "markers" (loans made for the specific purposes of gambling?) are treated in the same way as dishonoured cheques - if it can be proven that they were made with an intent not to honour them, then a criminal offence has been committed. In the UK charges relating to writing rubber cheques are usually along the lines of attempting to obtain good or services by dishonest means. They key bit here is goods or services. Writing a rubber cheque for chips in a casino wouldn't result in criminal prosecution as in the eyes of the law no criminal offence had been committed. Hence the reason that an Arab gentleman was able to walk away from his debts to a London casino of several million ££s not so long ago.
A personal view, but I don't think anyone would face criminal charges if they were caught using a gadget of sorts to increase their chances of winning, unless there was some sort of collusion with casino staff (which would then make it a case of conspiring to defraud).
But I take the point - don't do it in the States.
Seems a bit of a legal contradiction? If you raise a marker with the intent of never paying it and, lose all the chips gambling, you've committed a criminal offence. But if you raise a marker and win, the casinos are under no legal obligation to exchange your chips for cash, and could still insist on the marker being settled. Failing to do so could leave you open to prosecution for failing to honour it. No wonder lawyers in the US all have a field day with their fees?moo321 said:The rules about gambling contracts are very different across the US. Where I live, gambling contracts are not enforceable, and in fact you can sue to recover money lost gambling.
The US and UK are both common law jurisdictions. So, yes, what happens in vegas is relevant to the UK.HarryKuntz said:Newb99 is correct on this issue, It is NOT illegal to use a computer/device in a UK casino as long as the device does not interfere or alter the outcome of the game. For example. magnets on a roulette wheel would be illegal, whereas a roulette computer predicting where the ball will land would not.
Moo123 - US laws have absolutely nothing to do with UK laws, what happens in Nevada may as well happen on the Moon.
SuperTrump, yes you could legally use the device pictured, however it only keeps a running count. If you going to go to the trouble of using a computer, risk getting thrown out, chips/money confiscated, Police hassle (believe me, they would still be called incase you were up to illegal activities) legal battles and whatever else the casino try to throw at you, then you may as well use a decent computer and pull a large advantage. I hear there's a company in London that manufactures good quality roulette prediction computers that look like mobile phones for a few thousand quid each, they are supposed to be very good. However, you need to master ball measurements, so you also need to buy a casino grade roulette wheel so you can practise. You'll also need to be able to place many neighbouring bets very quickly, so you'll also need to be a master with both table and wheel number locations. Sorry can't help with BJ computers but I would imagine that anybody offering to sell "casino beating computers/devices" is 99 times out of 100 either a con artist or selling a worthless product (as you pictured).
Although the legal systems in the UK and Nevada may both be based on a common law principle in the absence of specific statute, there is absolutely no obligation on a UK judge to rule in line with any precident set in Nevada, or anywhere else outside of the UK for that matter. If a barrister argued in court that a certain ruling should be made because a ruling on a similar case had been made in Nevada, I'm pretty sure the judge would fall off of his seat in a fit of laughter - and the said barrister's competence in law would fall seriously into question.moo321 said:The US and UK are both common law jurisdictions. So, yes, what happens in vegas is relevant to the UK.