la_dee_daa
Well-Known Member
ok the game i play offers late surrender but if you take insurance you can no longer surender you hand which i found out today.... would this effect at what count you take insurance by losing this option?
ok the game i play offers late surrender but if you take insurance you can no longer surender you hand which i found out today.... would this effect at what count you take insurance by losing this option?
Interesting. If you have to choose one or the other, you should probably opt to surrender. The reason is that at the count where you start to take insurance, surrender becomes a very profitable play.
The exception I can think of is a high-index surrender play like 13 vs. 10, 14 vs. 9 or 14 vs. A, because at the counts where you're just starting to take those, insurance becomes a very profitable play.
ok the game i play offers late surrender but if you take insurance you can no longer surender you hand which i found out today.... would this effect at what count you take insurance by losing this option?
Did you check with the pit? Maybe, just maybe, the dealer was confused. I have never encountered a casino that would not allow both bets on the same hand. Why wouldn't they, since if you missed the insurance bet(50%) and surrendered(50%), wouldn't it guarantee them a winning hand(100%)? Is it possible that there is a gaming commission somewhere that believes it would help the player?????
This is second-hand info, but I know someone who knows someone who was backed off for taking insurance, then surrendering. Seems like one of those "either an idiot or a counter" plays.
no worries about heat the pits are more worried about the dealers making idiot moves which happens way to often.. even the cage almost paid me out an extra $150 because she couldn't add my black and green chips up lol.
My kind of Casino![]()
![]()