learning to count
Well-Known Member
I use hi-lo and I play mainly six deck shoes. From what I read KO is better than hi-lo. I have heard other oppinions that KO is weak when playing shoes but strong for single deck. Can any one elaborate. Thanks LTC
KO vs Hi-lo
- Thread starter learning to count
- Start date
zengrifter
Banned
Re: KO vs Hi-lo -OVERALL...
... KO is slightly weaker than HiLo. zg
... KO is slightly weaker than HiLo. zg
learning to count
Well-Known Member
Re: KO vs Hi-lo -OVERALL...
Is hilo better for deviation indices on a shoe game than KO.
Is hilo better for deviation indices on a shoe game than KO.
zengrifter
Banned
yes
Rob McGarvey
Well-Known Member
Re: KO vs Hi-lo Differences
Hi Lo requires you to divide your Running Count to come up with a True Count, and in the end will give you a better understanding of what you are doing than KO with the one running count. Hi-Lo is also a good jump off point for higher levels of counting, which require you understand a True Count, or TC for playing and betting purposes.
Hi Lo requires you to divide your Running Count to come up with a True Count, and in the end will give you a better understanding of what you are doing than KO with the one running count. Hi-Lo is also a good jump off point for higher levels of counting, which require you understand a True Count, or TC for playing and betting purposes.