Truncating, flooring, or rounding for the Ken Smith strategy cards sold on this site?
- Thread starter mikeryn
- Start date
How do you manage to screw up virtually every response you give? You do realize that, for the only counts that really matter--the positive ones, where big bets are made and most strategy variations kick in--truncating and flooring are identical!
Rounding and flooring are both perfectly acceptable approaches and produce equivalent results. Truncating is less desirable, because of the doubly wide zero true count bucket, and is rarely advocated today.
Don
Rounding and flooring are both perfectly acceptable approaches and produce equivalent results. Truncating is less desirable, because of the doubly wide zero true count bucket, and is rarely advocated today.
Don
Not every responses, but sometimes I have my expertise. Your math makes sense in some degree, but not exactly. This is all about a match between the player’s method and what the deviation indices are intended to be used. I am saying that most published deviation indices are based on the method of truncating, while the player counts are roughly based on truncating too; therefore, players should only care about indices obtained from truncating.
I just can't believe this imbecile named aceside still retains every right to post on BJ sites.
I would compare him to a "covid negationist" spreading false information and idiocies.
The dumb guy feels he has to give his poor opinion and spread is nonsense to every single BJ post on the internet.
Aceside is a TROLL!
I would compare him to a "covid negationist" spreading false information and idiocies.
The dumb guy feels he has to give his poor opinion and spread is nonsense to every single BJ post on the internet.
Aceside is a TROLL!